So, they would have been more vulnerable and you wouldn't have to have such a powerful bow.
所以,既然普通弓箭容易造成受伤,你就不会需要用到那么强力的弓
I'm sure there were bows and arrows at that time, but they did not yet have the kind of armor that they would have in this time.
我能肯定那个时候已经有弓箭,但强力的盔甲,那时肯定还没有出现
Get out of your mind Henry V, forget the Battle of Agincourt.
忘掉亨利五世,1415年英王亨利五世于法国北部阿金库尔村以弓箭手重创兵力数倍于己的法军
However, there are light arm troops made up of those too poor to be in the phalanx, who do use projectiles and the projectiles are arrows, javelins, or stones thrown by slings.
然而的确有轻装部队,由没法进入方阵的穷人组成,他们使用投掷武器,包括弓箭,投枪,或者绳索绑着的石头
They had very poor bows and arrows.
古希腊人的弓箭是非常落后的
Is it unlikely that people would actually have been able to do anything like that? - Yes, of course, the Iliad has various people who are very good archers, who could kill the other guy.
是不是古希腊的战斗中,不可能发生那样的事情,-对 当然了,《伊利亚特》的确记录了几个优秀的弓箭手,可以射杀敌人
应用推荐