We could also figure out the formal charges, and obviously the formal charges between these two atoms, they're going to be identical, we're only dealing with oxygen atoms here.
我们还可以把形式电荷算出来,显然这两个原子的形式电荷,应该是完全相同的,我们要处理的只有氧这一种原子。
I left out the noble gases here because they do something a little bit special, and actually, I'm going to give you one last clicker question today to see if you can tell me what you think noble gases do.
我并没有把稀有气体算在里面,因为它们的电子亲和能有点特别,实际上,我将会把这作为今天的,最后一个选择题,来请大家告诉我,你们觉得稀有气体电子亲和能应该是怎样的。
STUDENT: So, how do you come to a conclusion as to which you should use then, if you can determine the size based on solution, or based on input, so how do you decide?
学生:所以,你怎样决定你该用,哪个来算呢?现在如果你可以选择是,基于解决方案的大小,还是基于输入的大小,你应该怎样决定呢?
Some of those countries are really reliant on oil, ... so they really have to do-- they really should do a calculation of efficient portfolio frontiers.
有些国家过于依赖石油了,所以他们真的需要-,他们真的应该好好算一算,有效边界。
Evil gits" Is maybe one too, but this is certainly one.
自私鬼"应该也算个术语吧
and the first you are going to be reading will be a chapter in a book I wrote 5 or 6 years ago I guess it's almost 6 years now since 1998 to came up.
首先你们要读的,是我5年或6年前写的一章,我想应该是至今6年了,从1998年算的话。
So I did not do any counting up here, you should make sure you do counting, I apologize.
这里我没有算,你们应该保证你们算了,我这里要道歉。
It's always a good first approximation, because you need to start somewhere in terms of drawing Lewis structures, but then if you go and figure out the formal charge and you just have lots of charge separation or very high charges, like a plus 2 and a minus 2 and a minus 1 all different places in the atom, what it should tell you is maybe there's a better structure.
它总是一个好的第一近似,因为在画路易斯结构的时候,你总需要一个起点,但是如果你在算出形式电荷之后,发现有很多电荷分开了,或者说有很高的电荷,比如有一个正二,一个负二,还有一个负一1,在原子的各个地方,这应该就是在告诉你,或许还有一个更好的路易斯结构。
And also I wanted to mention in terms of checking your Lewis structures, regardless of what they are, you should always go back and I had 10, and then count 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, because you always need to make sure you have the same number of valence electrons that you calculated in your actual structure.
我还想提一点关于检查,你的路易斯结构的建议,不管它们是什么,你总是应该回去检查一下,我有十个,然后数一数,二,四,六,八,十个,因为你总是需要确保实际价电子的数量,与你在结构中算出的数量相等。
We can look at the 2 p, which should have one radial node, and we just figured it out for the, excuse me, 3d for the 3 p has one radial node, and for the 3 d here, we should have zero radial nodes, we just calculated that.
我们看2p,它有一个节点,我们已经知道对于,不好意思,是3p有一个节点,对于,它应该没有径向节点,我们刚刚算过这个。
应用推荐