• And let's say our second electron now is really far away, such that it's actually not going to shield any of the nuclear charge at all from that first electron.

    距离原子核非常非常近,我们说第二个电子处于非常远的位置,这样它不会对第一个电子,感受到的来自原子核的电荷量有任何屏蔽作用,我们最后要说的是。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • Of course, if we saw no shielding at all what we would end up with 3 is a z effective of 3.

    当然如果我们说没有任何屏蔽,我们最后得到的,有效电荷量是。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • 9 or . 8 7 are possible, they actually aren't possible because even if we saw a total shielding, 1 the minimum z effective we would see is 1.

    。39和0。87是可能的,实际上它们是不可能的因为即使,我们看到了一个完全的屏蔽,最小的有效电荷是。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • And the point that I also want to make is the way that they differ, z effective actually differs from the total charge in the nucleus due to an idea called shielding.

    我也想指出的一点是它们不同的方式,有效的z事实上不同于原子核的,总电荷量,因为屏蔽效应。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • We know that it has to be equal to less than 2, because even if we had absolutely no shielding at 2 all, the highest z effective we could have is 2, so it makes perfect sense that we have a z effective that falls somewhere in the middle of those two.

    我们知道它必须小于,因为即使完全没有一点屏蔽,最高的有效的z是,所以我们得到的有效电荷量处于,两者之间就非常讲得通了,让我们来看看另一个例子。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定