If I understand it correctly, science as science insofar as its belike scientific methodology, he needs to be defended.
如果我没有弄错的话,就论文所用的科学方法本身而言,就论文所用的科学方法本身而言,作者的立场应该受到维护。
So it might be something like that, a tiny little something that one would set down like a couple of elements.
所以创作的支点可能是类似这些的,很小很小的事情,作者会把它们列出来,就像一系列元素一样。
Yes, Barthes talks about the death of the author, but even Barthes doesn't mean that the author is dead like Nietzsche's God. The author is there, sure.
是的,巴尔特谈到了作者已死的问题,但和尼采所说的上帝已死这个层面上的内容还是有所不同,作者肯定就在那里。
It's sort of a sympathetic look at--that's the name of this-- of these expiring dudes there.
作者对他们报以同情,这幅画的名字就叫《同情的目光》
that after Lolita.) But what I mean is that the reader must know when and where to contribute his imagination, and this he does by trying to get clear the specific world the author places at his disposal.
有些人可能就会那样想),但我的意思是,读者必须知道何时何地需要发挥想像力,这样以看清作者所设置的特定的世界,在这篇小品文中。
At the same time, I do mean to give you some sense of the period in which they're writing, some sense of modernism as a field, as one of the richest fields in English language writing.
同时,我也会给你们提供一些背景知识,来了解作者创作的年代,以及现代主义的思想领域,就其作为英语文学创作最丰富的领域之一而言。
A lot of journals do blind reviewing now because of the evidence I talked about before regarding sexual stereotypes, that whether it has a male name or a female name makes a difference. So those are not-- those are group level in that they're not saying, "You get rid of your prejudices by trying harder."
现在很多报刊都审查论文都是匿名的,原因就是我刚才讲的,性别刻板印象,名字会透露作者是男性或女性,这样会影响审查公正,所以…,这些群体要摆脱刻板印象,并不是一味压抑就行的“
It's not just a question, as obviously Foucault and Barthes are always suggesting, of deferring to authority as though the authority were the police with a baton in its hand, right?
这不仅仅是一个,如福柯和巴特经常暗示的一样明显的,尊崇作者权威就好像这种权威,是一个手握警棍的警官的问题,对吧?
The literary creator starts to seem a lot more like the divine creator, that is to say, and in a certain sense could be understood as a placeholder for the divine creator.
这些作者越来越被神化了,换句话说,在一定意义上,就被理解为神圣造物主的预留的位置。
It has no more connection with its author from birth on and roams the world on its own.
作品一旦创作成型就和作者没有联系了,它独立的存在着。
Like I said, they wanted them to be traced back to the apostles.
就像我所说的,作者希望人们认为它是使徒所写。
Barthes says, "Once the Author is removed, the claim to decipher a text becomes quite futile."
巴特说:“一旦作者被移位,那么解读原文就没有希望了“
And so yes, the signal that this field of discursivity is on the table is introduced by the name of the author but it remains just a name.
所以的确,这种公开的散漫性的信号,就通过作者的名字被介绍出来,而且也仅仅只是个名字。
And one of the things one may immediately detect is whether or not the person who wrote the poem was indeed writing the poem and thought that she or he was in command, right?
一个人在阅读时很快就能发现,写这首诗的作者是否,真的是在独立作诗,认为自己对文字完全具有掌控权?
At bottom, Empson doesn't really settle into the rigorous consideration of the author, the text, or the reader as if they were separate functions.
实际上,Empson并不会,仔细考虑作者,文本,读者这些因素,就好像他们各有功能一样。
It's a problem if we reject the police-like authority of authors, of whom we may have a certain suspicion on those grounds, when we certainly don't feel that way about Marx and Freud.
但若我们并不喜欢马克思和弗洛伊德,那么如果我们排斥警察,就好像因为对作者有所怀疑,而排斥作者权威的话,就有问题了。
This much, by the way, Wimsatt has in common with Gadamer, because Gadamer doesn't talk much about authors either, and Gadamer is interested in what he calls meaning, the subject matter, die Sache. Right? He's not interested in your sort of expression of that meaning or my expression of that meaning.
顺便说一句,文萨特和葛达玛很大相同之处就在于,葛达玛也不太强调作者的作用,而是对文章的含义,主题感兴趣,不是吗?,他不关注作品在用,你的还是我的表达方式来表现内涵。
Well, look at this footnote: And the history of words after a poem is written may contribute meanings which if relevant to the original pattern should not be ruled out by a scruple about intention.
那么我们就来看一下这条脚注:,在诗产生后,语言的意思也就跟着产生了,这种意思如果和原始的形式不同,就不该有对作者意图的顾虑。
The Northern Kingdom Israel is going to come in for very, very bad press at the hands of the Deuteronomistic writers which shows that they probably favor or come from Judah So the northern kings are going to be uniformly denigrated.
北方王国以色列将会进入,一个非常坏的形象,在《申命记》作者的笔下,这表明他们可能喜欢或者来自于犹大,那么北方的国王们就全部都被诋毁。
The author is a signal, is what Foucault calls a "function."
作者是一个标志,就像福柯所说的“功能“
应用推荐