That's not good enough, and so the repetition in the plot reinforces the repetition of the sound in question.
由于她总是不能正确地发音,这样一来情节的重复,就加强了声音的重复。
To figure out even what this thing is, let alone how to use it properly. So, you know, I'm sympathetic.
就连认出这是什么东西(都很困难),更别说正确应用它了,所以我很同情这点。
I don't think that's quite true, but there's a general feeling that, as Matthew Arnold said, Wordsworth has no style.
虽然我不认为那一定正确,但是普遍认为,就像马修阿诺德说的,华兹华斯没有固定的风格。
We are now able to find proteins and genes that are at the correct location for the transduction machinery.
我们就能够查明转导蛋白质和基因,处于正确的位置。
And so, even by units analysis, if the units come out right, you've got a good shot that unless you've really, really messed up, that the answer is going to be right.
甚至在单位分析中,如果你的单位正确,你就能做的很有条理否则会一团糟,而注意了单位你的答案才有可能正确。
You put some inputs in, it has a contract that says if you put the right kind of inputs in you'll get a specific output coming out, but you don't have to know what's inside of that box.
你可以将输入一些内容,它相当于一个条件合约,如果你的输入是正确的,你就能得到特定的输出,但是你不知道盒子里面有些什么。
If life on the experience machine is not everything, then there's more to the best possible life than getting the insides right.
如果体验机器上的人生并非一切,那么获得最好人生需要的,就不止是内在的正确。
And the truth is, when you each gave your demonstrations, nobody spoke properly because nobody spoke Here's the sentence: "Glorp fendel smug wuggle."
事实上,当你们听到例句的时候,没有人能正确地说出例句,因为本来就没人会说,比如这个句子,"快醒醒,疯狂,自满,拥抱"
Also, formal charges can be checked, as I just said.
另外,我们可以检验一下形式电荷是否正确,就像我刚才说的。
However they get there, if they get to the right answer, people respect them.
无论中间的过程如何,只要他们能够得到正确答案,就能赢得人们的尊敬。
It's as though I've walked across the stage like this realized, damn, it was the guy over here or rather I found the smallest element here who beat out number 2 over here so I can now put number 1 into place and recall that it didn't matte if I punted whoever was standing here 'cause they were given to me randomly anyway.
这就像是我这样走过讲台,然后才发现要找的人在那儿,或者说发现了最小的元素,那么就可以将1号放在正确的位置,而在这儿的是谁并不重要,因为他们本身就是,随机的。
All right, so if the other guy is pricing above costs, I want to set prices below his so that I steal the whole of the market and make profits on those sales.
正确,如果对手定价比成本高,我就想定价比他的价格低,这样我就可以占领整个市场,并获得销售利润
If you put the electrodes in the right position and you measure in the right way you can detect the electrical activity of the heart and record it on a strip recorder like this one shown here, or display it on a computer.
如果将电极放置正确,并采用正确的方式检测,就能检测到心脏的电活动,并将它记录在像这样的长图记录仪上,或者显示在电脑上
Then what the program will do will give you a series of things it might potentially be because it recognizes that you could be entering more than one thing, and then you have to take the one that you think is closest to what you're actually eating.
系统就会给你,一系列它认为正确的选项,因为它可能会认为你的东西不止一种,之后你要选择,与你所吃食品最接近的选项
I'm not saying he was right, and the damn fool should've got down and got real with the railroads, but he didn't.
我并不是说他就是正确的,就连笨蛋白痴,都已接受铁路的存在,但他却不能
He watched over my shoulder as I wrote stories yelling, "Yes, that's right. Wow, man," and "Phew!"
我写作的时候,他就在我的背后看着叫着,是的,非常正确!噢!伙计,太对啦,哇“
His idea was, the formula written for the opposite one will have the opposite angle; That turns out to be the correct answer.
他的方法是,反过来的方程,以相反的角来表示,那就能推出正确的答案了
You've got to place the boundary at exactly the right place, otherwise you've got a bit too much in your system or a bit too little.
你要把边界,设置在正确的位置上,否则你的系统就会要么多出一部分,要么少一部分。
If you got the right idea, you will get some funding.
如果你找到正确的方法,就能得到注资。
As long as that is true, we can't continue to believe that invisible things can't be destroyed.
只要这是正确的,就不能相信无形的东西不能毁灭。
Pseudo code. Now, you're all linguistic majors, pseudo means false, this sounds like code that ain't going to run, and that's not the intent of the term. When I say pseudo code, what I mean is, I'm going to write a description of the steps, but not in a particular programming language.
伪代码,基于你们都是学语言的,伪代码意味着不正确,这听起来就像是没法运行的代码,这可不是我们学这个的目的,当我说到伪代码的时候,我的意思是要对步骤进行一个描述,而不是某种特定的编程语言。
All right, the question is, as I started to say, is, "What are the right primitives?"
好了,就像我刚开始说的,问题在于,“什么才是正确的基本类型呢?“
And because you can't really know, it's difficult to make the right kinds of plans.
又因为你无法知道,要作正确的规划就困难重重。
And therefore, they are not systematic about interpreting the results.
预期的正确实验结果,因此,他们就没法做到系统化的去分析结果了。
So in some sets, as long as x has the value I want, it ought to do the right thing.
所以在某些结构中只要x的,只是我想要的我就能得到正确的结果。
Now, as obvious a statement as that is in this algorithm, it turns out that is the key to this whole problem being solved correctly without my algorithm looping infinitely.
这是此算法中很明显的一句话,也是正确解决,整个问题的关键,否则此算法就会陷入死循环。
You can run into issues of things like overflow, underflow, with floating point numbers and when you see a whole bunches of ones, it's particularly a good time to be suspicious.
来看看哪儿会出问题,你可能会碰到浮点数中的溢出和下溢问题,当你碰到一系列这种问题后,可能就会适时的开始怀疑结果的正确性。
It's a gene that's on the plasmid, and this particular gene confers a specific biological property to cells that have the plasmid and can use it properly.
它是质粒自带的基因,如果细胞能够获得这种质粒,并正确的利用它的话,这段基因就能赋予该细胞某种生物学特性
Not so clear it is true.
这就不太清楚是否正确了。
应用推荐