If I want my kid to do something, I should say yes one out of every ten times.
如果我想肯定孩子的某种行为,我就应该在他的每十次提议中同意一次。
And if we add consent, then more people are willing to consider the sacrifice morally justified.
如果有征得同意,更多的人就愿意认为,这在道德上是正当的。
Now, is there someone who can explain, those of you who are tempted by consent, can you explain why consent makes such a moral difference?
认为派克同意就属正当的,有没人能解释一下,为什么派克同意了,在道德上就有所不同呢?
Why does an act of consent make such a moral difference, that an act that would be wrong taking a life without consent, is morally permissible with consent?
为什么征得了同意,就能在道德上如此不同呢,没有征得同意就杀人,在道德上是不允许的,征得同意就是允许的吗?
Why would consent make a moral difference?
为什么派克同意了,在道德上就会不同呢?
If the right to private property is natural, not conventional, if it's something that we acquire even before we agree to government, How does that right constrain what a legitimate government can do?
如果私有财产是与生俱来的,而非约定俗成,如果这是在我们同意组建政府前就拥有的,这个权利又如何能限制合法政府的行为呢?
And if the majority of those who are governed doesn't agree with you, then you know, you're choosing to live in a society and you have to operate under what the majority the society concludes.
如果不能获得大多数同意,那你,你既然选择活在这个社会,你就得按大多数人的意志来办事。
If you want to go live in the state of nature, that's fine, but you can't take anything from the government because by the government's terms, which are the only terms under which you can enter the agreement, say that you have to pay taxes to take those things.
如果你想生活在自然状态下,没问题,但你就不能享受任何政府福利了,因为根据政府组建条款,也是我们同意组建政府的唯一条款,规定只有你缴税了才能享受那些福利。
应用推荐