From moment to moment, language changes, but if we're to understand it as language we have to honor its simultaneity.
语言无时无刻不在变化,但是如果我们要理解它,我们就必须尊重它的同时性。
We are honoring instead the integrity of what they're saying without thinking about whether or not it might be true.
我们事实上反而在,尊重他们所说内容的真实性,却从未想过这到底是不是真的。
We want to respect that person's wish to go on living, we want to make life easier for them if we can with some kinds of assistance.
我们应该尊重人们,生活下去的意愿,我们希望他们,能够通过一些辅助设施,生活地更加轻松。
The laws are not only like our parents, they are like our ancestors, as we might say, who are owed respect and piety.
法律不只像是我们的父母,也像是我们的祖先,我们可以说,他们值得我尊重与孝敬。
But those human laws are only legitimate if they respect our natural rights, if they respect our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property.
但这些人类法律合法的唯一前提,就是尊重我们的自然权利,尊重我们不可剥夺的生命,自由和财产权。
And for Problem Set One, we'll defer to some online documentation for the specifics.
对应习题集,我们将尊重一些网上的文档中的细节。
But whether or not he does address them-- we're not doing Plato any honor, we're not doing him any service, if we limit ourselves to simply trying to grasp, here's what Plato thought.
但是不论他有没有涉及那些,如果我们束缚自己,而只是去,揣测柏拉图的真实想法的话,我们不仅对柏拉图的不尊重,也没有给予他任何帮助
In other words, we no longer say, "How does the author exert autonomous will with respect to the subject matter being expressed?"
换言之,我们不会再说,“作者是如何在尊重所要表达的主题的前提下,把独立的意愿加进去的?“
We don't refer--we have no reason to refer, - if we respect the autonomy of the poem as such, we don't refer-- we don't appeal to an authorial intention.
我们不能,我是说如果我们尊重,诗歌的意志自由的话,我们不能也没有理由-,为诗歌加上作者的意图。
Is that the only reason to respect people?
这就是我们该尊重别人的唯一理由吗?
应用推荐