So Thomas said something which was true, but it doesn't quite match with the definition of a dominated strategy.

托马斯所说的是对的,但这的确劣势策略的定义不太相符

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And there're different people who have different tastes about what you do with this piece and that piece of land how do you approach this political issue and that issue.

不同的人有不同的喜好,在应该对这一国及那一国实行何种策略的问题上,在如何解决这一以及其它政治问题上意见都不同。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

Now of course, the presbyters had seized control in the first place because they disapproved of the tactics of suppression and intervention that had been deployed by the bishops, or the prelates, of the old church.

当然，现在长老首先掌握了控制权,因为他们对旧教会主教和教士的,镇压和干预策略非常反对。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

So in previous definitions, we've seen the qualifier, for all, be on the other player's strategy.

在以前的定义中,“对所有的”这个限定词,修饰的是其他参与人的策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The second question was about China and there was a special report in the recent Economist talking about the ravenous appetite that China has for natural resources right now. I was curious what you ? thought the effect that would have on global financial ? markets and your investing strategy?

第二个问题是有关于中国的,在最近的《经济学人》杂志上有一篇特别报道,该报道是关于现在中国对自然资源的极度渴望,我非常想知道您个人认为,他们这种情况对全球金融市场会有什么影响呢,对您的投资策略又有什么影响呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

What Thomas said was, right is never a best choice, that's true.

托马斯所说右并非总是,最优策略,这是对的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So we've got the firms, they're the players, I know what their strategies are, I know a little bit about the structure of the market, and I still need to tell you what payoffs are.

我们有了公司,作为参与人,我知道它们的策略是什么,对市场的结构也有一些了解,我还需要告诉你们收益是什么

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

The idea was to think of a strategy that is the best you can do, given your belief about what the other people are doing: what your opponents are doing, what other players are doing.

在你已经对别人如何行动有一定信念时,你能想到的最佳的策略,你的对手会怎么做,其他人又会怎么做

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

What I suggest we do is we do what we did last time and we start to draw a picture to figure out what my expected payoff is, depending on what I believe the goalie is going to do.

我建议用上次的方法,作图来表示在我对门将的策略,存在某种信念下,我的预期收益

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So Christine is correct in saying that once we delete the strategies 1 and 10 once we realize that those positions are not going to be chosen by our sophisticated candidates then we realize that probably choosing 2 isn't a good idea either.

克里斯汀说的很对,一旦我们剔除了策略1和10,一旦我们意识到,不会有人选择这些立场时,我们会发现,选立场2或9可能也不是个好主意了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

For each q2 that you give me or that Player 2 chooses, I want to find out and draw what is Player 1's best response.

对与参与人2的每个策略q2,我想知道参与人1的最佳对策是什么

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

If Player II chooses 4, then the synergy leads Player I to raise his best response all the way up to 2, but these strategies up here above 2 are never a best response for Player I. Is that right?

如果参与人II选4,协同导致,参与人I的最佳对策变成2,参与人I的那些大于2的策略,也永远不会成为最佳对策,对不对

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选