It begins--this will be news to most of you in the beginning God created the heavens and the Earth and it.
它是以-- 这对你们大多数人来说是新鲜的,一开始,上帝创造了天堂和人间
I know, for a lot of you, it's like, OK, I got a heavy problem. Let's see, def Foobar open paren, a bunch of parameters.
我知道这对你们中的大多数人来说,应该没问题了,好,这儿我碰到了,一个严重的问题,我们看看,一堆参数。
But, I think what most of you, actually having MIT come to MIT, have probably realized is sometimes it's nice to major in a science, because you can't just pick up a reaction and do it in your kitchen on the weekend, where as you can sometimes join a book group and do that.
但我认为对你们大多数人来说,既然来了,可能已经意识到最好是主修一门科学,因为你不能在你,周末的时候在厨房里做化学实验,然后你就可以参加一个读书俱乐部。
For most people, that's a difficult concept and-- I think I may have mentioned some of this before, but let me give this history.
这个概念对大多数人来说有些难,我记得我之前提及过其中一些,但还是让我来讲述一下它的历史
I'm going to claim that assuming that products are not identical, is a pretty safe assumption for most of the world, for most things that you're going to see in the world.
我认为假设产品不同,对大多数人来说很容易被接受,对多数情况来说
It's important to most people in the world.
这对大多数人来说都很重要。
Well, one way of course is to accept the objection and say " "You're right Death isn't really bad for me " And some philosophers have indeed accepted that very conclusion, maybe Epicurus Most of us want to say " "No, no Death is bad for me" So we need a better answer to the ?" "Oh yeah? When is it bad for you?"
一种方式当然是接受它并说,“你是对的,死亡对我来说真的没什么坏处“,而一些哲学家确实接受了,那个结论,也许比如伊壁鸠鲁,我们大多数人想说,“不,不,死亡对我来说有坏处“,于是我们需要一个更好的答案来回答,“是么?,它什么时候对你有坏处了“
And so similarly as Gmail's priority inbox, it's gonna be pretty flawed for a lot of us at least initially because it just doesn't know the answers a priori correctly unless we teach it or program it to be better. There is also another flaw in here or multiple flaws arguably.
类似于Gmail的优先收件箱,在起初使用时对大多数人来说它是有缺陷的,因为它不知道如何正确判断优先级,除非我们事先告诉它或编写程序改良它,另外这里存在一个或多个漏洞,可以说是缺陷。
But for most of them it's not true.
但是对他们中的大多数人来说,这不是真的。
应用推荐