That revisions may have been made, so that you might have different sources that have been revised or put together in different ways. Right?
这些修订,以便于你可以对,不同的素材,以不同方式,进行修改或者重组?
So then you can format your own description of a word which can help you learn something better.
这样你就能构建自己对一个词的描述方式,那样能帮助你更好地学习一些东西。
And zoom on the easiest question for you, that way two things happen.
放大对你来说最容易的问题,这是这两个事发生的方式。
Sidney's talking about the various kinds of discourse: - divinity, hymnody, science, philosophy, history-- in other words, all the ways in which you can contribute to human betterment and human welfare. He says in the case of all but one of them, each discourse is a "serving science."
西德尼进行了很多方面的阐述:,神学,赞美诗,科学,哲学,历史-,换句话说,所有你能想到的,对人类福祉有益处的方式,他说这里面除了诗学,其他都是“服务性学科“
Because it allows you to very softly express a dislike about a suggested action.
因为这个句型能让你以一种委婉温柔的方式表达对某一提议的否定。
Well, one way of course is to accept the objection and say " "You're right Death isn't really bad for me " And some philosophers have indeed accepted that very conclusion, maybe Epicurus Most of us want to say " "No, no Death is bad for me" So we need a better answer to the ?" "Oh yeah? When is it bad for you?"
一种方式当然是接受它并说,“你是对的,死亡对我来说真的没什么坏处“,而一些哲学家确实接受了,那个结论,也许比如伊壁鸠鲁,我们大多数人想说,“不,不,死亡对我来说有坏处“,于是我们需要一个更好的答案来回答,“是么?,它什么时候对你有坏处了“
What do you think of the way the professors at UCLA teach students?
你对UCLA教授的教学方式有什么看法?
应用推荐