-
In fact, you'll find the probability of this happening 3% is only about 3 percent, of it happening just by accident.
实际上你会发现,出现这种情况的概率是，所以说他们的实验结果完全是偶然的。
-
and then we're going to use the results of the experiment to write a lab report
然后我们根据实验结果来撰写实验报告，
-
Chemistry and biology, physics has the advantage that the desktop experiments can do are relatively straight forward than not dangerous.
化学和生物的话，物理有一个好处就是,桌面实验能做到,直观却不危险,地反映结果。
-
What's particularly interesting is you get this effect easily with undergraduates but you also get it with four-year-olds and with monkeys.
但这个实验有一个很有趣的地方,在本科生中做这个实验，很容易就得出这个结果,而在四岁小孩和猴子中，同样能得到这个结果。
-
And so this is not like a math problem set or a physics problem set. Or, like a high school physics lab, where we all know what the answer should be, and you could fake your lab results anyway.
或是物理问题集合,又或者是高中的物理实验室，我们对这些问题都有确切的答案，或者你可以把你的实验结果改成正确的，有些事情是不能明确界定的。
-
So, introduction, "in order to explain the results of experiments on scattering of alpha rays by matter, Professor Rutherford," and there is a footnote to the Rutherford model.
嗯，绪论，为了解释实验的结果,关于物质的alpha散射，卢瑟福说“,这儿有一个卢瑟福模型的脚注。
-
And again there, too, you saw an experimental result you were presented with that says, well at least to the extent that it could be measured, it was obviously getting very small.
再一次，你看到了一个,你经知道的实结果，至少在实验测量的范围内，对理想气体条件下的气体这一项很小。
-
And what it turns out is experimental evidence tells us that these two structures are equivalent.
而实验结果也告诉我们,这两种结构是等价的。
-
And then the investigators actually measured these things, and found that with reported and actual energy intake, how many calories people were consuming, there was really quite a difference.
研究人员实际上得到了以下结果,实验对象汇报的和实际的能量摄入,也就是人们摄入的卡路里,两者有较大差异
-
That's something you find out by experiment.
这个结果是实验得到的
-
Here we give many lecture material until late they do the lab and then we come back and discuss the results.
在这里我们直到他们做实验时,才会发各种讲座材料,然后我们回到讲座,讨论实验结果。
-
They shared fun with firecrackers, which was a disastrous thing which nearly brought the experiment to an end.
让他们一起玩烟花，结果变成一场大灾难,差点害得连实验都做不下去了。
-
Well, that's a laboratory effect but there are some more interesting manifestations of cognitive dissonance.
这是实验室中得出的结果,但其实认知失调还体现在很多有趣的地方。
-
And it turns out that this version people are slower at than the other version suggesting that their associations run one way and not the other.
结果发现在第二个实验中,人们比第一个实验时的反应要慢,这表明他们倾向于把白人和好词,把黑人和坏词联系一起，而不是反过来。
-
And the finding is that the majority of people will deliver fatal shocks to this person who they had never met based on the instructions of another person.
实验结果表明大部份人,会对这个从来没见过的人进行致命电击,根据的是另一个人的指示。
-
The notion of a self-assured experimenter-- The results would be very different if the experimenter himself seemed nervous, unwilling to proceed, confused, but he was confident and he kept saying that he will take responsibility.
还有电击者的自信程度-,实验结果会大为不同，如果电击者,紧张，不愿进行电击，迷惑，但电击者很有信心，不停地说,他会承担责任。
-
And we must know what the result is supposed to be. Typically when you run an experiment, you say, and I think the answer will be x.
这样我们可以来查看代码的进程,我们还必须清楚结果应该是怎么样的，比如当你运行一个实验的时候。
-
It only works within species. So, in another experiment they put a rabbit in the other room and the chimpanzee would slap the lever repeatedly to make the rabbit scream in pain and jump.
这种结果只出现在同种动物上，在另一个实验里,他们在另一个房间放一只兔子,结果黑猩猩不停地拍杠杆,让兔子痛得上跳下窜，大声尖叫。
-
And, of course, all that's left is this positive pudding. So that's not going to do anything either. And what he found when he did this experiment, was that the count rate with still 132 000 counts per minute.
剩下的是带正电的布丁,也不会产生什么影响,结果他实验上观测到,计数器测得每分钟132000下,所以到目前为止,他可以说实验。
-
Not just one answer at the end.
尤其是实验能有有用的中间的结果就更棒了。
-
So in this experiment here, delta p is less than zero. You need to have this whole thing greater than zero. So delta T is less than zero as well. So if you're below the inversion temperature and you do the Joule-Thomson experiment, you're going to end up with something that's colder on this side than that side.
所以在这个实验中，Δp小于零,这全部都大于零,因此ΔT也小于零,所以如果在低于转变,温度的情况下做焦耳-汤姆孙实验,最后的结果是,这边的温度比这边低。
-
And therefore, they are not systematic about interpreting the results.
预期的正确实验结果，因此,他们就没法做到系统化的去分析结果了。
应用推荐