He's not claiming--and he points this out to us-- that his explication is the true one. That's not his point at all.
他并未声称,他自己也指出了这点-,他并未声称他的解释就是真实的,他完全不是这样认为的。
Why do people become firemen, policemen, soldiers, freedom fighters, all activities that cannot be explained in terms of self-interest alone?
不可能只用拿工资的理由,就能完全解释为什么总有人愿意做,消防员,警察,军人和争取自由的斗士?
So understand that hermeneutics isn't necessarily about, as Gadamer would put it, merging historical horizons.
所以,解释学不完全是,正如伽达默尔所说,历史观的碰撞。
But Klawans also asserts, and I quote, that "Imitatio dei does not exhaustively explain sacrifice in ancient Israel," and in fact, we should be surprised if any one single theory would indeed explain sacrifice.
但是克洛文同时也宣称,“模仿并不能完全地解释股以色列的献祭,“,事实上,如果有某个独立的理论真的解释了献祭,我们会十分惊讶。
when I was explaining it to Professor Shiller, he said he didn't quite follow it, so I probably shouldn't try it, and he knows more than I do.
当我向席勒教授解释它的时候,他说他不能完全理解这一理论,所以我很可能不应该尝试它,他知道的比我多。
Now, usually at this point somebody in the lecture hall raises their hand and says, Well, my boyfriend or my girlfriend and I are complete opposites ? and how do you account for that, Professor Salovey?"
经常讲到这里,课堂上会有人举手并发言,我和男朋友/女朋友,是两个完全不一样的人,萨洛维教授,你对此作何解释“
I've explained my embarrassment about using terms that I really have no absolutely no idea of the meaning of except that I'm told what the meaning of them is in the books that I am reading, which are the same books that you're reading.
我已经解释过了,用这些我完全不知道什么意思的词,真的很尴尬,除非有人告诉我他们是什么意思,就像这本书里说的那样,而我读的这本书,也就是你们现在也在读的。
应用推荐