So that it's not what the text means -which might be anything, according to Hirsch, if you just appeal to the text; it's what the author means to say.
所以不是文本的意思,而是作者想说的东西,赫施认为,文本的意思几乎可以是任何东西,如果你仅仅参考文本的话。
If that's right, then it seems as though there'd be something irrational and inappropriate about simply disregarding those facts.
如果那是正确的,好像仅仅无视这些事实,有些不合理和不合适。
And if you come and ask a question that you could have easily answered by doing the reading, coming to lecture, or using Google, they're going to have less patience.
所以如果你过来仅仅是问一个,你能很轻松的,通过阅读、上课、或者,在谷歌上搜索就能得到答案的问题,他们会失去耐心的。
And I think if you are outside, whether you are walking or sitting, paying attention as a spiritual practice is really not only seeing, but having all of your senses engaged in what's going on is important.
我想如果你在户外,无论是走,或是坐,作为感受灵性的实践,所谓的注意,并不仅仅是看,而是调动你所有的感官,来感受身边的一切,这才是要点。
So if you demonstrate something by writing an intelligent answer just by outlining it and saying, well, what I would do is I would equate the energy lambda and then solve for lambda, I can see that you know what is going on.
如果你想证明一些东西,通过写下一些很天才的答案,仅仅大致说一下,好的,我想做的是能量相等,然后解出,我能看到你知道怎么做。
We can know this information even if we just knew that the bond was stronger, we wouldn't need to look at a graph here, because it turns out that if you have a stronger bond, -- that also means that you have a shorter bond -- those two are correlated.
我们依然可以得到上面的信息,即使我们所知道仅仅是这个键更强,我们不需要去看这个图,因为事实上如果你有一个更强的键,这也就意味着你有一个更短的键-,这两点是互相关联的。
It would be much easier and nicer if we could just simply get Israelis and Arabs together and the conflict would end.
如果仅仅是将,以色列人和阿拉伯人聚在一起,冲突就结束,那事情就简单得多,容易得多。
right, he's saying, wouldn't it be great just to have it there before us?
是的,意思是如果仅仅面对某事物而不去思考不是很好吗?
Whereas the--if I take the rhythm out of the Ninth Symphony really Beethoven there is just going up and down a scale so it's very conjunct.
无论哪里,如果我将第九交响曲的,节奏单挑出来,你就会发现贝多芬这里,仅仅是一个个升或降的音阶,这是级进的典型例子
Machiavelli said in that famous chapter 25, that the prince, if he is lucky, will master fortuna about half the time, only about 50% of the time.
马基雅维利在有名的第25章里说,君主,如果他幸运的话,可以在一半的时间里掌握命运,仅仅是50%的时间。
Now, people--some people make an enormous jump from that and wrongly suggest that what the Greeks basically did was-- well, if you want to take the most extreme statement of it, stole their civilization from the other folks.
现在有些人,跳脱了这个定义,错误地认为,希腊人仅仅是,如果选取其中最极端的陈述,从他人那里窃取了文明
I'm going to go over here, and let me define a couple of these things.
仅仅是用来显示值的,好,让我们看看如果,我运行这个程序会有什么结果。
That's something that you might not notice if you just focus on the intrinsic nature of the taste.
这是你可能不会注意到的一点,如果你仅仅把重点放在品尝的本质上。
Intensity, if we increase the intensity, we're not increasing the energy in each photon, we're just increasing the number of photons that we're shooting out of our laser, whatever our light source is.
强度,如果我们增加强度,我们增加的不是,每个光子的能量,我们增加的仅仅是,从我们激光源射出的光子数,无论我们的光源是什么。
So, if you're at hanging your exam from high school on the fridge and you want to make it look more impressive, you could just rewrite the question as that, and essentially you're answering the same thing.
所以如果你把你的高中测试题,挂在冰箱上,而且想让它看起来更难忘,你仅仅重新写出这个问题就可以了,本质上你是在做相同的事情。
So although I'll be largely talking from the perspective of the physicalists If you haven't become convinced of the physicalism so at least explore what will we say about death if we've decided that people are basically just bodies.
所以虽然我会经常,从物理主义的角度讨论,但如果你不信服物理主义,至少也探究一下如果我们认为,人仅仅是肉体,我们会如何看待死亡。
Now, if we push the dualist to explain what is it about free will that rules out the possibility that we are merely physical objects, I think the natural suggestion to spell out the argument goes like this, and this is where we were at the end of last time.
现在如果我们让二元论者去解释,什么是自由意志,它又是如何否定,人仅仅是物理实体这种可能性的,我认为他们自然会这样,阐述这个论证,这是就我们在上节课结束时讲到的内容
So if you look at the energy diagram, what we see is that the 4 s orbitals are they're just ever so slightly lower in energy than the 3 d orbitals.
如果你看能量图,我们看到的是4s轨道,他们仅仅比3d轨道,能量低一点点。
So if we say that l is just talking about our kinetic energy part, our rotational kinetic energy, and we know that electrons have potential energy, then it makes sense that l, in fact, can never go higher than n.
如果我们说,l仅仅是,描述动能项,我们的旋转动能,我们知道,电子有势能,所以可以理解,l不能比n高。
应用推荐