So, if you want to attack urban air quality, this is probably moving in the wrong direction, OK?
所以如果你想攻击都市的空气质量,这可能是一个错误的方向,对吗?
So that would, this is actually a very common mistake and it makes sense if you think about it.
这的确是一个非常普遍的错误,如果你想想,这个是言之有理的。
f truth is the recognition of the systematic character of a certain kind of error, then it would be fully dependent on the prior existence of this error.
如果真理是,对一种错误的系统化字符的认可,那么它会完全依赖于这个错误的先前存在。
Well, the second that you choose Beta then someone's going it's in someone's best interest- to take advantage of it.
第二个错误 如果你选了β,那么别人就会从中攫取到好处
So you say well, rather than rushing off and fixing this one bug, let me pull back and ask, bug is this a systematic mistake that I've made throughout the program?
因此我们应该回头想想,这是不是我在整个程序中都,在犯的一个系统性错误,而不是匆匆忙忙的去修复这一个,如果确实是系统性错误的话?
If a person has the basic concept down, regardless of numerical errors, if the person has the basic concept down, he or she must get at least five out of ten.
如果一个人有一些基本的概念,不管一些数字上的错误,如果他有基本的概念,至少都能够得到一半的分。
That'll catch a lot of just silly mistakes for you if you go back and see it and you don't have all of that.
这可以让你抓到很多低级错误,如果你回去发现它们不一样的话。
So the personality theory,follow the personality, is wrong if we say neither of these guys is Napoleon.
所以人格理论所遵循的人格特性,是错误的,如果我们说两者都不是拿破仑。
If you were in the wrong place at the wrong time, you were history. That was all.
如果你在错误的时间出现在错误的地点,那你就将死定了
But if my students can catch me making a mistake, it means they are following it and they are not hesitating to tell me.
如果我的学生能发现我犯的错误,这证明你们确实在听课,并且愿意直言不讳
Here's a twist, and if you found people who were less wonderful than you all, and asked them, you'd get a lot of people saying the curving thing.
这是错误的,如果你去找一些没有你们优秀的人,问他们这个问题,很多人会回答你沿着曲线飞出
- But there's one potential gotcha here -- and this is where you have to be kind -- of piecing together the little clues along the way -- what have I done that's interesting here that had I not, I would have had a mathematical error?
但是这里有一个可能性-,这就是你需要把,一些线索拼凑在一起-,我这里所做的是很有趣的,如果我不这样做,我可能已经犯了个数学错误?
He has it exactly right. OK? Is this smaller than that? No. Now that's a slight lie.
不,这是一个小谎言,抱歉,是一个小错误,如果我要这么说。
If you're getting these compilation errors, well, -- when you compile, notice there's a number of key help -- the number of helpful tidbits here.
如果你们得到了这些编译错误,当你编译的时候,注意这里有很多关键帮助-,这里很多帮助信息。
If you're not updating some variable by incrementing it or decrementing it -- if you're not changing anything, presumably the conditions are never going to evaluate to false or the opposite, so you're just going to have an infinite loop, which might be your goal, but odds are it's not.
如果你不通过增加或减少它来改变一些变量,-如果你不改变什么,大概那个条件永远不会变成错误的,或相反的,所以你将得到一个无限循环,那可能是你的目标,但可能也不是。
So generally, if you don't get an error message in a command line environment like this, that's good.
一般来说,如果你在命令行界面,没有收到错误信息,那就是好消息。
It's a common mistake to make if you forget that I've actually declared that variable up top, but wait a minute, I know any time that I use a variable, I have to declare it.
这是一个通常犯的错误,如果你忘了,之前在前面已经声明了这个变量,等等,我知道在任何时候,我使用一个变量,我必须声明它。
Just a few small points. First of all, keep in mind that the bug is probably not where you think it is. Because if a bug were there, you'd have already found it.
第一,记住错误可能不是,发生在你认为的地方,因为如果那儿有一个错误,你可能已经找到了它。
If it's just an addition error, the recitation instructor has authority to make that adjustment.
如果那只是附加错误,导师有权利,更正成绩。
bugs If there are multiple bugs in the program, it's because you made multiple mistakes.
他们并不会,如果在程序中有很多,那是因为你犯了很多错误。
I should warn you again that I'm very likely to make mistakes when I'm doing this kind of thing, so please catch me I do.
我还得提醒一下大家,我总算错,如果发现错误请马上指出
The problems are set up so that, if you start down the right path, it should be pretty straight-forward to work it through If you start down a plausible but incorrect path, you can sometimes find yourself stuck in the weeds somewhere, and we want to bring you back in.
问题提出了,如果你从,一开始就走正确的道路,解决的途径,就一目了然了,如果你走上一条貌似正确但实际错误的道路,你会在某时某刻,发现自己陷入泥沼,于是我们就会把你拉回来。
And that mistake might mislead us if we start thinking the personal identity case.
如果考虑人格同一性的问题,这个错误可能会误导我们。
And what do I do if I get a key error?
如果我得到了关键字错误该怎么办呢?
It's best if you don't know what that is or even if you do mistakenly attribute it, misattribute it, to physical attraction, romance, intimacy, passion and commitment, it's love.
最好是如果你不知道是什么,甚至如果你错误认定,以为是生理吸引力,浪漫,亲密,激情和承诺,那是爱情。
A little later we'll turn to the question of, well, if hedonism is not the right story, ? what else belongs on the list, or is it the right story?
过会,我们会转向探讨…,如果享乐主义是错误理论,名单上还有什么?它是不是正确的理论?
But it's an attempting mistake if you're not being careful.
但如果你们不注意,这个错误还是有可能的。
You got the wrong number, forget it.
如果你得到错误的数字,忘了吧。
So we've embedded some error checking, if you will, into our implementations.
所以我们植入了一些错误校验,如果你愿意,在我们的执行代码里。
应用推荐