If my code is correct, what should the average price be, after say, 100 days, if there's no bias. Pardon?
如果我的代码没写错的话,如果没有偏向值那平均价格会是多少呢,如果没有偏向值,请说?
bug It's not true now. If there is a bug in the program it's there for only one reason.
如果程序中有一个,那一定是有原因的,是你通过例如犯了。
Do you have a visceral sense, "oh, don't do that"? If you do, you were probably taught, like me: "never, never damage a book.
你们想发自肺腑地说一句:“哦不,不要这样“吗,如果是,那你们和我从小被教育的一样:绝对不要损坏书本。
So, what we can do instead of talking about the ionization energy, z because that's one of our known quantities, so that we can find z effective.
我们做的事可以代替讨论电离能,因为那是我们知道的量子数之一,那是我们可以解出有效的,如果我们重新排列这个方程。
And if that's true, then of course, we no longer have an argument for the indestructibility or nearly indestructibility of the soul.
而如果那是对的,当然我们就,不能再论证灵魂的不可摧毁性,或者几乎不可摧毁性。
If I own the last one hundred shares, it's all mine; I don't have to take any--I can do whatever I want.
如果最后一百股是我的,那公司就是我的,我不需要付任何...都是我说了算
The first sentence in the argument was, if the people in the room choose random, then they will choose around 50. That's true.
第一句话是,如果教室里的人随机选择,那平均数会落在50左右,这很对
If you don't know that somebody should've taught you that in the 6th Grade or the 4th Grade or the 1st Grade or somewhere.
如果你不知道,那你们肯定是忘了,在六年级或四年级的时候老师肯定讲过,或者一年级,无所谓具体什么时候
If that's for me, tell them I'm busy please.
如果那是找我的,请告诉他们我现在正忙着。
The idea that he had was, if you go from me to you, with a clockwise rotation, you go from you to me by a counterclockwise rotation.
他的方法是这样的,如果这个矢量从这转到那是顺时针方向,那么这个矢量转回来就是逆时针方向
If not,what does it mean we are?
如果不是,那我们是什么?
If so, what world was it?
如果是,那是怎样的呢
Really there's no work to be done if I am handed all in sorted order so, you know, There's no work to be done if I'm handed all of the arrays in sorted order so, you know, if I demand that you give me this assumption that the cups are already sorted and then I'll sort them for you, I mean, this is kind of a cyclical argument.
如果杯子是有序排列的,那就没必要再对它进行排序了,同样如果给出的序列本身就是有序的,那也不必再做什么,如果给出这样的假设:,杯子已经有序,但仍需要对其进行排序,这像是个循环的论点。
All right? A linear search, I start at the beginning of the list and walk all the way through it. All right, if I'm lucky and it's at the low end, If it's not, if it's at the far end, I've got to go forever, and you saw that last time where this thing paused for a little while while it actually searched a list this big.
如果很幸运就在开头,那运行起来很快,如果是在末尾,那就一直得走到头,上次看到了,如果搜索空间很大,程序都会暂停一会,好的,那我希望你们。
If I would point at that tower and say, "I built that." I've been saying something false.
如果我指着那座塔说,“那是我搭的“,那我就错了。
If you try to imagine a smile with no body at all, it can't be done. Why?
如果你要相信一个没有身体的微笑,那是根本做不到的 为什么呢
I can imagine if I had gone to another priest, another catholic church would be problematic.
我能想象如果我去了另一个天主教堂,那将会是多么的麻烦重重。
So then, if that's right, then to ask, "Is there life after death?" Is just asking, "Is there life after the end of life?"
那么,如果这是对的,那试问,死后能否继续活着,也就是在问,生命结束后是否还有生命
The argument is not saying, "If something is possible, if I can imagine it, it's true."
这个论证并不是在说,如果某件事是可能的,如果我能想象它,那它就是真实的
Well, if that's the right thing to say about the France case, then why not say the same thing about the near-death experience case?
如果关于法国的例子是对的,那为什么关于濒死体验,我们就不能得出相同的结论呢
Of course, for those people who think it really is the same tower, "No problem."
当然了,如果有人认为那就是,同一座塔是没问题的“
But if the answer is "no," then that means hedonism's got to be wrong.
如果答案是“不“,那就意味着享乐主义一定是错的。
Since then, since we know about atoms and molecules now, we can rationalize the concepts of thermodynamics using microscopic properties, 62 and if you are going to take 5.62, that's what you'd learn about.
既然我们现在已经知道了原子和分子,的概念),我们可以用,微观属性,来阐释热力学中的概念,如果你会选修5。,-那是你将要学到的。
That says, if something is true, do something.
如果一些事情是真的,那就去做。
But if it's me,what's the key to personal identity?
但如果那是我,那么个人认同感的关键是什么?
The format is the same. I'm going to ask for some input, and then I am going to use that procedure to check, is this the right type of value. And I'm trying to use that to do the coercion if you like. Same thing if it works, I'm going to skip that, if it not, it's going to throw the exception.
格式是一样的,我需要一些输入,然后我要用一个过程来检查,是否是正确的值,然后你就可以做强制转换了,如果能运行,那是一样的,我打算跳过这段,如果不正确,那就会抛出一个异常。
If there is branching,neither of the branches is me.
如果存在分歧,那没有任何一个分支是我。
If that's the key,then it is Napoleon.
如果那是关键,那么他就是拿破仑。
If death was bad for me, that would be a fact If my death is bad for me, that would be a fact and we'd ask ? well, when is that fact true?
如果死亡对我来说是有坏处的,那这就是一个事实,如果我的死亡对我来说有坏处,那就是一个事实,而我们就会问,这个事实什么时候是真的?
应用推荐