As we could have same personality without literally same brain, if personality is the key to personal identity, that would still be me.
我们可以拥有同样的人格,不需要同样的大脑,如果人格是人格同一性的关键的话,那个人还是我。
That slide is on your--is in the slides that are distributed if you want to follow on that website, there's the picture that I copied yesterday.
在发给你们的幻灯片里,如果你想在那个网站上做深入了解,这是我昨天从网站上拷贝下来的一张图片
If you solve for that, you find y-y0=v0^/, and if you put in the v_0 I gave you, which was what, 10?
如果你解这个式子,你会得到y-y0=v0^/,如果再把我给你的v0代入,那个数是多少 10
So the very last two lines of code I'm saying this, s2 the original string is s1, the copy of the string is s2, but if I haven't lost you, what are we really going to see when we print this?
最后两行代码是这样的,原字符串是s1,那个字符串的拷贝是,但是如果我没有忘记,当我们打印的时候,我们将看到什么?
So it's an address, it's a pointer, address pointer, synonyms for now, so it's the address of a char so this makes sense because s1 is also the address of a char so if I wanted to make a copy of that address this is absolutely the right syntax.
是一个地址,是一个指针,地址指针,也就是,char型数据的地址,这是有意义的,因为s1也是一个char型数据的地址,所以如果我想要复制那个地址,这个绝对是正确的语法。
应用推荐