-
Constant. Ooh, constant says, no matter what the length of the list is, I'm going to take the same amount of time.
这个算法用的时间是相同的，我不这么认为，如果我们创建一个十倍于以前大小的数组。
-
On the other hand, if we have a perfect covalence bond, we have identical equal sharing.
另一方面，如果我们有一个完美的共价键，有相同程度的电子共享。
-
So what I want to tell you is we also always get the same bond order if we instead only deal with the valence electrons.
我想要说的是我们如果,只考虑价电子也可以得到相同的键序。
-
And we know that Down does best if I think it was equally likely that the person was going to choose Left and Right.
我们还知道如果我们认为对手,选左或者是右的可能性相同的情况下,下是此情况下最好的策略
-
If we're all holding the same portfolio, that has to be the total, so that would mean that 9% of all wealth is oil, 9% of all--is oil 27% of all wealth is stocks, and 64% is bonds.
如果我们全都持有相同投资组合，总的投资组合就是如此，那就意味着9%的资产投资石油，市场总体的投资组合就是9%是石油,27%投资股票以及64%投资债券。
-
Cv The only difference is it'll be Cp instead of Cv, B but there it is for pathway B. There it is for C a pathway C. So the state functions that we're familiar with are doing what we expect they ought to be doing, right? If you go around in a cycle, starting and ending at the same place the state functions have to stay the same.
是Cp而不是，这是路径,这是路径,所以我们熟悉的态函数的行为,正与我们预期的相同，对吧？,如果你沿着循环走一圈,开始和结束于同一个位置。
-
So, in general what we see, and this is always true if we're comparing the same atom, and in general, if we're comparing different types of molecules, but we know that a single bond is always weaker than a double bond, which is weaker than a triple bond.
通常我们会看到，这对比较相同原子来说总是正确的，通常，如果我们要比较不同种类的分子，但我们知道单键,总是要比双键弱，双键总是要比三键弱。
-
But we know that just by this calculation, that we don't have equal sharing.
但是如果通过仅仅计算，我们得不到相同程度的电子共享。
-
So, for example, if we look at the 2 s orbital of argon, it's going to have the same amount of nodes and the same type of nodes that the 2 s orbital for hydrogen has.
所以举例来说，如果我们看氩的2s轨道，它有相同数量的节数,和相同类型的节点,对于氢的2s轨道。
应用推荐