• Say it again: if everyone chose 1, then everyone's best response would be to choose 1, so that would be a Nash Equilibrium.

    重复一下,如果每个人都选了1,那么每个人的最佳对策也就是1,这就会成为纳什均衡

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So if Firm 2 produces this amount then Firm 1's best response is this amount.

    如果公司2的产量是这么多,那么公司1的最佳对策就是这个产量

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If you took a best response to some believe, you can say I took this action because I believed other people are going to do this.

    如果你针对自己的信念做出了最佳对策,你就可以说,我是所以这么做,是因为我认为其他人会那么做

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If Firm 2 produces this amount then Firm 1's best response is this amount.

    如果公司2的产量是这么多,那么公司1的最佳对策就是这个产量

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So if we know people are not going to play a best response that's never a best response, and we know if we people are not going to play something which is never a best response, and we know people are not going to play which is not a best response, which is not a best etc., etc., etc.

    如果我们知道人们不会采用最佳对策,说错了,是不会采用非最佳对策,如果我们知道人们不会采用,非最佳对策的策略,就知道人们不会采用非最佳对策的策略,以此类推了

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If Player II is playing S2*, Player I will want to play S1* since that's his best response.

    如果参与人II选择S2,参与人I就会选最佳对策S1

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So if Firm 2 is playing a best response, This is a best response for Firm 2, given that P1 is at C.

    如果公司2给出了最佳对策,这是公司2针对P1是C的最佳对策

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If P2 is actually above the monopoly price, then what's my best response in that case?

    如果P2真的高于垄断价格,我的最佳对策是什么

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If Firm II is charging C, Then a best response for Firm 1 is to set price equal to marginal costs, and if Firm 1 is pricing at marginal cost, then conversely a best response for Firm 2 is to price at marginal cost.

    如果公司2选择了C,公司1的最佳对策是,定价在边际成本,如果公司1定价在边际成本,同样的,公司2的最佳对策,也是定价在边际成本

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If Player II chooses 4, then the synergy leads Player I to raise his best response all the way up to 2, but these strategies up here above 2 are never a best response for Player I. Is that right?

    如果参与人II选4,协同导致,参与人I的最佳对策变成2,参与人I的那些大于2的策略,也永远不会成为最佳对策,对不对

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So strategy ?i is a best response to the strategy S-i of the other players if my payoff from choosing ?i against S-i, is weakly bigger than that from choosing Si' against S- i, and this better hold for all possible other strategies I could choose.

    策略?i是其他参与人策略S-i的,最佳对策,如果此时我选?i的收益,弱优于此情况下选Si'的收益,这对于所有我可以选择的策略都成立

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定