If you try to imagine a smile with no body at all, it can't be done. Why?
如果你要相信一个没有身体的微笑,那是根本做不到的 为什么呢
No, I'm sure you'll get dangerous moments if you are going to go into war and all that kind of thing, but.
不,我相信如果你去战场,那时所有的事情都会很危险。
In other words,you believed something was apostolic if it taught stuff you believed.
换句话说,你会相信某本书是某使徒所写,如果它说的东西是你所相信的话。
Another question is if you believe in modules-- if there are modules, what are they?
另一个问题是,如果你相信模块理论,如果模块是存在的,那么它们究竟是什么
And if you believe in souls, you're likely to think same soul as well.
如果你相信灵魂论,你也会认为同样的灵魂是关键。
And tributary, of course, if you don't believe in souls, if you don't believe in soul's exist, that you certainly can't appear to the existence of souls, the continuative soul, the sameness of soul as the key to personal identity.
还有,必然地,如果你不相信灵魂这回事,如果你不相信它的存在,你肯定无法,进一步相信什么灵魂的延续,无法相信同样的灵魂,是保证人格同一性的关键。
If you believe black men are criminals, then when you see a black man who is a criminal you'll chalk it down as support but you'll pay less attention to evidence that white men are criminals and some black men are not criminals.
如果你相信黑人都是罪犯,当你看到一个是罪犯的黑人时,你就会觉得这是证据,但你不会注意其他证据,证明白人也有罪犯,黑人也有不是罪犯的。
If you believe in a soul, what's the argument for it?
如果你相信灵魂是存在的,你的论证是什么
For those of you who still do believe in the existence of souls I suppose you could take a great deal in discussions that follows as some form of large conditional or subjunctive if there were no souls then here's what we have to say.
如果你们有人,还是相信灵魂的存在,或者你可以从以下的讨论里,也学到一些东西,把讨论看成有条件性和假定性的,假设没有灵魂,然后就是我们要讨论的东西。
Of course,these are also theological matters, and so I'm not trying to say anything here today to argue you out of the theological conviction that God will resurrect the body or God will transplant your personality into some new angel body, but if you believe in the personality theory, that will be you,or what have you.
当然,这些也是神学上的问题,我今天不会和你争辩,上帝能复活肉体或者将人格移植,进入新的某个天使的肉体,但如果你相信人格理论,那还是将成为你。
应用推荐