Just a few small points. First of all, keep in mind that the bug is probably not where you think it is. Because if a bug were there, you'd have already found it.

第一，记住错误可能不是，发生在你认为的地方,因为如果那儿有一个错误,你可能已经找到了它。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

It's absolutely constitutive of the ideal of freedom, of our freedom; because if we don't try everything, if we don't give ourselves an opportunity to decide for ourselves, then, of course, someone will invariably be making those decisions for us.

它也构成了自由的理念，我们的自由;,因为如果我们不是尝试过所有东西，如果我们不给自己做决定的机会，当然，总是有人会帮我们做决定。

耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

And if they're a premade salad then it would be even more difficult because you're not constructing it yourself, so it's hard to uses based on these sort of things.

如果那是预制色拉,就更麻烦了,因为那不是你做的,就很难进行统计

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

You can brute force it and unfortunately, the so-called Caesar cipher is not very secure because if you assume, for our purposes in English alphabet with 26 characters, say all lowercase for all uppercase, my God, you only have to try like 24, 25, 26 possible rotations until you can figure out what his secret message is.

你可以强行解密但是不幸地是，所谓的凯撒密码不是很安全的,因为如果假设，对于我们的26个字符的字母表,指明所有的小写为大写，我的天，你只要试24，25次，26次就可以解答出,密文的内容。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

A bold claim would say, "The facts about death, if I thought about them, would change my behavior, but not because it would give me a reason to change my behavior-- " simply because it would influence my behavior."

一个大胆的观点会认为，“关于死亡的事实，如果我考虑了它们，就会改变我的行为，但不是因为它给了我改变行为的理由-,只是因为它影响了我的行为“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, unfortunately, we know this is not the right answer, because if you take the first derivative, I get 2t.

遗憾的是,我们知道这还不是正确答案,因为如果对它求一阶导数,会得到2t

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

bug Now, this was not the bug in this program because I did, in fact, use the equality operator and so it feels like if I type the word foo both times I should, in fact, get back you type the same thing.

现在，在这个程序中这个不是，因为，实际上，我使用了等于号,如果我输入单词foo两次，我返回给你“输入了相同的东西“

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选