So what we're going to see is less shielding, which means that it will actually feel a higher z effective.
那么我们将会看到更少的屏蔽,这意味着将会感受到更大的有效核电量。
Total quantity being produced is less than would be produced under perfect competition, but more than would be produced under monopoly.
此情况下的总产出,比完全竞争情况下的要少,但比垄断情况下的要大
Another way to say that it's going to be less, so you don't get confused with that the fact this is in the numerator here, there is that negative sign so it's less energy but it's a bigger negative number that gives us that less energy there.
另一个方式去说它将会变得很低实用,你们不用在这里的计算器的事实感到迷惑,这里有一个负号实用,它是更少的能量,但它是一个更大的数字,这里了它给了我们更少的能量。
And, in fact, the proportion as you go from rat, cat, and monkey, humans— less and less of it is devoted to projection areas and there is more and more to other things.
事实上你可以看到,从老鼠开始,到猫,到猴子,再到人类,投射区所占的面积越来越少,而负责其他功能的皮层,所占面积则越来越大
It's not even a zero-- or rather if I have less, you'll have less- that's a negative sum game-- or a zero sum game-- if I have more, you'll have less- it's a fixed pie.
甚至不是一个零…,或者我更少,你也会更少,那也是负和游戏-,或零和游戏,我更多,你就会更少-,饼就那么大。
So I claim that this total quantity being produced is less than the competitive quantity, but more in total than the monopoly quantity.
我说吧,这种情况下的总产出,比完全竞争产量要少,但比垄断产量要大
They're less shielded because they're closer to the nucleus, they feel a greater z effective.
它们受到少的屏蔽,因为它们离原子核更近,它们感觉到一个更大的有效电荷量。
应用推荐