Sorry, said that wrong, p1 radius 1 and angle 2, 2 radians is a little bit more than pi half.
而是半径和角度的表示,在这个例子中点,并不对应这个点,它实际上对应的是。
So if we actually go ahead and multiply it by the volume of our shell, then we end up just with probability, which is kind of a nicer term to be thinking about here.
乘以壳层的体积,我们就得到了概率,在这里从这个角度,理解问题更好一些,如果我们考虑的是。
As time increases, the angle increases and we can ask, "How long does it take for the particle to come back to the starting point?"
这个角度随着时间在增加,我们会问,"质点需要多长时间,才能转到起点"
Are you looking at the picture from a certain point of view?
你是否在从一个特定角度看着这个画面?
But the fact that this type of report the goverment published itself suggest that they are thinking about it and once it becomes part of the public discourse this typle of issue... some action is likely to follow.
政府自身愿意写出这种报告,从另一角度说明,他们在思考这个问题,一旦这个问题受到公共瞩目,这类问题。,就可能有人开始动手解决。
So we do, in fact, have a dependence on what the angle is of the electron as we define it in the orbital.
实际上当我们定义电子在这个轨道,它的波函数的确是和角度有关的。
So in this case, what would you say that the angle is here?
在这个例子里,你觉得角度是多少?
If you're in this state, you will necessarily, given the laws of physics and the way the computer's programmed and built and so forth, these wires will turn on, turn off, these circuits will turn on, turn off, boom, suddenly you'll be in that state.
如果你站在这个角度,你必定会考虑,在物理定律和电脑编程原理,如何构造的等等确定的情况下,这些电线通或断,这些回路通或断,嘣,突然你就处在那个位置上
As t increases, this angle increases and the particle goes round and round.
随着 t 的增加,这个角度也在增大,这个质点不停地转圈
应用推荐