-
The thematic problems that Milton is attempting to tackle are written into the very grammar and the syntax of the poem.
弥尔顿想要处理的主题,就在诗歌的语法和句子结构里边。
-
but I mark the whole paper up with a lot of red ink if there are mistakes,
但我在批论文的时候，也会把语法错误的地方用红笔标出来，
-
It must be, after all, a grammaticization of rhetoric," the whole point of which is that the worm of interpretation keeps turning. All right?
那一定是将修辞语法化“，整个观点,诠释的螺丝一直在旋转，对吧？
-
He published a treatise that he had written earlier on grammar, inventing his own system for the understanding and the learning of the Latin language.
发表了一篇他之前写的关于语法的论文，在这篇论文中他创建了自己的一套理解和学习,拉丁文的体系。
-
Now this is perhaps, frankly this is really the reason that people tend to get confused with the new piece of syntax because the * means different things in different contexts.
也许，这就是大家对这个新语法,混淆的原因,因为*的在不同的环境中有不同的意义。
-
In this case it says, this is a syntax error, and it's actually highlighting where it came from so I can go back and fix it.
在这个例子中它显示这是个语法错误，并且会高亮显示它的位置,以便于我去修改。
-
And most linguists would argue "Yes," that languages are highly constrained in how they do things.
大多数语言学家们都会回答"是的",语言在很大程度上依赖于语法规则的使用
-
Edith, a reader of sublime simplicity, as de Man says, misinterprets the rhetorical question as a grammatical question: "What is the difference? I'm curious to know."
而依迪斯一个极端天真的读者，正如德曼所说，错误地将这个修辞问句理解成一个语法型问句：,“区别在哪里呢，我想知道“
-
Okay, so while not equal to, so bang equals, exclamation point equals is computer science syntax for saying not equal to, 0 while not equal to 2 which it is not, it is equal to 0.
好的，尽管不等于不是相等的反写,但惊叹号在计算机科学的语法是不等于的意思，尽管不等于2，但它是等于。
-
Alright, so maybe a little underwhelming and we saw already what this program is going to do but let's just go through this process once before we start doing more interesting things and then we'll come back and at least give you a hint of what some of these syntactic details are doing.
好吧，这个程序也许太平庸了，让人印象不够深刻,我们也知道这个程序是干嘛的,在我们开始更有意思的事情之前,让我们再来讨论一下整个过程后再回来,这些语法细节到底是在做什么呢？,先给你们一点小小的提示。
-
Syntax is a more technical term but it means the same thing as grammar.
这里说的语法是更加专业的术语,在意义上和平时说的语法是一样的
-
It's also other aspects of phonology, syntax, and morphology.
还有些在语音,语法和语态方面的其他问题
-
And even though the syntax, the characters you are about to see on the screen and in programs today onward is a little more arcane, it's a little uglier looking, you've got semicolons and parentheses and fairly arcane syntax, realize that at the end of the day these are just arbitrary human conventions, the ideas are identical to this thing here.
可能你在屏幕上，编程中见识到的,语法，字符看起来非常晦涩难懂,甚至可以说是丑陋，像什么分号啊,括号啊等等，还有一些难七八糟的语法，但是到了最后，你会发现,这些都不过是一些人为约定而已，而蕴含在里面的编程思想跟这个例子并无二致。
-
So a bit of uninteresting math, a bit of focus on sizes of types, but any questions on syntax or concepts thus far before we now put this to the test?
一些比较无趣的数字，一些关于类型的大小,在我们现在进行试验之前,你们对这其中的语法或概念有什么问题吗？
-
They cannot be reconciled as traditional students of the relationship between rhetoric and grammar in studying the rhetorical and grammatical effects of literature take for granted.
它们不可能和解,像传统的修辞学与语法学关系的学生,在研究修辞学和语法学对文学的影响之时想当然地做的那样。
-
And I want to describe both the syntax, what we're doing, and then the semantics of how do we use it and what does that mean.
现在我想解释一下语法，我们在做什么,还有我们使用时的符号,以及意义。
-
By the way, I'm going to leave also to your sections the strange confusion that ensues in taking a rhetorical device, metonymy, and making it synonymous with grammar on the axis of combination.
另外，我还将把奇怪的困惑留给你们思考,这个困惑随着使用修辞学策略和转喻而产生，并使得它在结合轴上与语法有着同样的意思。
-
It's just some bogus language we made up that's kind of English-like, kind of look C-like now that you've seen this syntax, but it was just an arbitrary language.
并不是真正的编程语言,好比某种“伪英语“，或“类C语言“,你现在在语法中看到的就是所谓的伪代码，非常随意。
-
Well, this is syntax you might have used in caesar or vigenere.
好的，这个语法你们可能在caesar，或者vigenere中用过。
应用推荐