And what's fallen out when we do that, because in each case, one of the first derivatives gives us the entropy.
当我们这样做时就得到了结果,因为在这些例子中,一阶导数是熵。
Or take this value out of memory, run it through some other simple operation, stick it back in memory.
或者从记忆存储器中取出一个结果,在类似的操作中运行,再插回到存储器中。
It turns out we won't really using it, needing to identify it on the graph so much in chemistry.
结果是我们不会实际运用它,那样我们在化学中,将要在图中识别它很久。
What's particularly interesting is you get this effect easily with undergraduates but you also get it with four-year-olds and with monkeys.
但这个实验有一个很有趣的地方,在本科生中做这个实验,很容易就得出这个结果,而在四岁小孩和猴子中,同样能得到这个结果。
Again, in an electric field line splitting observed, the intensity of the line splitting varying with the intensity of the applied electric field.
结果也证明谱线在电场中也会分裂,而且其分裂程度,随电场强度变化而变化。
They might be,for example,in an accident, and come close to being killed,but walk away without a scratch.
比如说在事故中幸存,差点送命,但结果毫发无伤。
But in Genesis, Creation is not the result of a struggle between divine antagonists.
但是在《创世纪》中,创造并不是与其他神力斗争的结果。
He came out number one in the United States as business school professor.
结果在所有美国商学院教授中,他排名第一
It turns out in the case of Hepatitis B, the way the lifecycle proceeds-- the cells make too much of the protein and not all of it gets assembled into the virus.
结果显示,在乙肝的病案中,病毒生命周期的发展情况,细胞制造了大量的蛋白质,但并不是所有的蛋白质都会组合成病毒
So more than doubling the risk can certainly site to the population Now these kind of results show how important it is to do studies that don't group everybody in the population together.
由图可见,发病率差异量超过一倍,这些研究结果表明,在研究过程中分组的重要性
I thought similar to Chris actually and I also thought that if we got two-thirds and everyone was choosing numbers in between 1 and 100 ends up with 33, would be around the number.
实际上我的想法和克里斯的相近,我也在想我们得选平均数的2/3,每个人都在1到100中选择的话,最后结果可能是33,会接近于平均数的2/3
So it turns out in C, you can absolutely represent the idea of a condition, a branch, a fork in the road.
结果在C语言中,你们完全可以表示出环境的概念,一个分支,一个三岔路口。
Notice one last piece. If I'm going to do that, run through all possible answers, I still want to know, gee, what if there aren't any answers? How do I return that case?
注意最后一段,如果我要这样做,也就是运行所有可能的答案,我还是想知道要是没有结果呢?,在这个例子中应该返回什么呢?
And those instructions, by the way, are very simple: they're things like, take the value out of two places in memory, and run them through the multiplier in here, a little piece of circuitry, and stick them back into someplace in memory.
顺便说一句,那些指令非常简单:,他们从记忆存储器中,取出两个位置的结果,在倍增器中运行,一小部分电路,再将它们插回存储器中的某些地方去。
Does it give you the answer that you expected it to give? Often, in practical problems, you'll spend just as much time doing performance debugging. Why is it slow?
它返回了期待中的结果了么?通常,在实际的问题中你会花,同样多的时间在性能调试上,它为什么运行这么慢?
As a result of this sort of conditioning, he then when he experiences real world violence, he responds with nausea and shock; basically, training him to get away from these acts of violence.
作为这种条件作用的结果,当他在现实中经历暴力行为时,便会引起恶心和休克;,总体来说,就是训练他远离暴力行为。
What this is, is you take a group of studies on an issue, you pool them all together, and then you weight studies differently depending on factors like how large they were, how good their methods were, and then you come out with overall estimates about the impact of something, in this case the Mediterranean Diet, on health outcomes.
所谓荟萃分析就是将某一问题的一组研究,汇总起来,并根据某些因素,赋予这些研究不同的权重,如基于研究的大小,研究方法的好坏等,然后得出关于某事物的影响的总体评估,在地中海式饮食中就是指健康结果
So that means that we don't have to worry about things like wave functions when we're talking about Lewis structures, but because they're so simple to use and because they so often predict the electron configuration of molecules accurately, we end up using them all the time in chemistry, so it's very valuable to know how to draw them correctly and to know how to work with them.
因此这也就意味着我们在讨论路易斯结构的时候,不需要担心波函数之类的东西,但是由于路易斯结构不仅简单易用,而且用它来预测分子的电子排布,经常可以得到非常精确的结果,结果我们在化学中一直都在用它,因此知道如何正确地画出并运用,路易斯结构是非常有价值的。
Well, that's a laboratory effect but there are some more interesting manifestations of cognitive dissonance.
这是实验室中得出的结果,但其实认知失调还体现在很多有趣的地方。
And it turns out that this version people are slower at than the other version suggesting that their associations run one way and not the other.
结果发现在第二个实验中,人们比第一个实验时的反应要慢,这表明他们倾向于把白人和好词,把黑人和坏词联系一起,而不是反过来。
Anybody know what happens In this case?
在这个例子中有人知道结果会是怎么样么?
It turned out there was no white van at all but in the first incident somebody saw a white van, this was reported in all the newspapers, then every other incident people started seeing the white van.
其实后来发现并没有白色小货车,但在第一起案件里有人看到白色小货车,所有报纸上都登了这条线索,结果在后来的案件中人们都看到白色小货车。
It turns out on a Linux system there's this command called "man" for manual page.
结果是在一个Linux系统中,这里有这样一个叫做“man“的命令,用来显示指南手册的。
And you might every once in a while get this, at least as we've done it in this case, this large move out at the end.
一旦你得到了这个结果,至少像是我们在这个例子中得到的结果,最后有一个很大的唯一变化。
In this case, in fact I do get a different behavior.
在这个例子中,实际上,我会得到不同的结果。
In either case, I take that value and multiply back by two, if it was even I get back the original number, if it was odd, I'm not going to get back the original number, so I can just check to see if they're the same.
在两种情况中,我都把结果值,再乘以2,如果x是偶数我就,得到了原来的值,如果x是奇数那么就不会得到,原来的值,因此我看看得到的值,和原来的值相等不相等就可以了。
unfortunately in Python you can, however, do things like this.
很不幸在Python中你却可以这么干,不过你期待结果是什么呢?
应用推荐