-
So this is a classic game, perhaps it's one of the most famous games, and therefore worth studying in the class.
这是一个经典的博弈案例,可能是最著名的博弈案例之一,它很值得在我们课堂上研究一下
-
Well, the reason, the way that we can check it is just to see if it's in between our two extreme 1 cases. We know that it has to be more than 1, because even if we had total shielding, 1 we would at least feel is the effective of 1.
好的我们可以检查它的原因和方式是观察,它是否在我们的两种极端案例之间,我们知道它必须大于，因为即使如果我们有完全的屏蔽，我们最小感到的有效值是。
-
But the very, sort of, nature of being an institution constrains almost everybody whether it's, in our case, all our investors have thirty-day liquidity.
但是，投资机构的本质在一定程度上束缚了,它所处市场里的每一个人，在我们的案例中，我们所有的投资者都拥有强大的现金流。
-
That's bad,right? Two different cases give us two different, diametrically opposed,answers on the very same question.
那就糟了，对吧？两个不同的案例，在同一个问题上给了我们截然不同的答案。
-
And we noticed the built in pressure to try to bring into alignment our judgments about particular cases and the principles we would endorse on reflection.
然后我们发现,要在特定案例之下，自圆其说我们的判断,校正我们一再确认的原则，难度越来越大。
-
And underlining what arises in this game, notice that in this game we're able to eliminate one of the strategies, in this case the strategy of shooting to the middle, even though nothing was dominated.
我们从这个博弈中可以得出,我们能够剔除其中的一个策略,在本案例中是从中路射门,尽管这里并没有劣势策略
-
And let's just suppose that we're dealing with the normal case, where the body functioning stops at the same time as the personality functioning stops.
让我们假设我们在处理通常的案例，生理功能通常和人格功能同时停止。
-
Given the no branching view,the no branching rule, we can say,in the ordinary case,look, there really wasn't anybody imprinted with my memories and desires in Michigan.
在这个无分支这个规则下，通常的案例下，我们能说，密歇根并没有人植入了我的记忆和欲望。
-
It is true that we're seeing some people thrown out of their houses, in some cases, because of some rather questionable financial practices that got people into mortgages that they shouldn't have gotten into.
确实我们看到有些人,被赶出他们的房子，在有些案例中，确实是有些有问题的金融操纵,使人们背上,本不该背负的债务。
-
And if we do that calculation, what we find out is that the binding energy, in this case where we have no shielding, 72× is negative 8 . 7 2 times 10 to So, let's compare what we've just seen as our two extremes.
我们会发现结合，能在这个情况中，没有屏蔽，等于-8。,所以我们来对比一下,我们在两个极端的案例中看到了什么。
-
The electron completely canceled out 1 it's equivalent of charge from the nucleus, such that we only saw in a z effective of 1.
电子完全抵消了来自原子核的等量电荷,这样我们仅仅看到有效的z为，在极端案例b中。
-
So in extreme case a, 1 we saw that z effective was 1.
在极端案例a中，我们看到有效的z是。
-
Okay, so I'm going to draw for the case, I'm going to draw the best response of Player I and I'm going to draw the best response for Player II in a minute, for the case B equals 1/4.
好的,我们要画这个案例的图像,我要在图中画出参与人I的最佳对策,一会还要画出参与人II的最佳对策,在这里B等于1/4
应用推荐