How do we have a conversation about what does it mean to be a well-rounded student at an American university today?
我们如何建立这样一个对话,就是在当今的美国大学中,如何才能成为一个全方位发展的学生?
The way God speaks to us in that place, and the way God care for us and provides for us is really the source of control rather than being ourselves.
上帝在那里和我们对话,上帝关爱我们,满足我们所需,这一切证明,上帝才是最初的控制者,而不是我们自己。
You should be bringing some of the things we talked about when discussing his work, into dialogue with and in conflict with some of the evidence you'll be finding in the text itself.
我们需要回想以前讨论,在上帝与别人的对话中,你可以发现前后矛盾的地方。
So, for example, to give an example that Plato actually gives in the dialogue, we are all awake now, but previously we were asleep.
举例来说吧,柏拉图在对话中举过这么个例子,我们现在都清醒着,但之前我们都在熟睡
At the very beginning of the dialogue, Glaucon we see Socrates and his friend Glaucon.
在对话的一开始,我们读到苏格拉底和他的朋友。
And the obvious worry that gets raised in the dialogue at this point is this: How do we know that when the death of the body occurs the soul doesn't get destroyed as well?
在对话中的这个阶段,一个明显的担忧就是,我们怎么知道,当肉体死亡的时候,灵魂不会随之被摧毁
And the speakers are able, presumably, to pursue the audacious arguments that will appear in the rest of the book without the oversight of the head of the household, the embodiment of conventional opinion.
众人想必,因此可以放胆发言,如我们在往后对话中所见,而不必担心一家之长的监督,惯例见解的体现。
So for our purposes, we don't have to ask ourselves when Socrates in the dialogue says something, is this a view that the dead man Socrates actually would have held or is this simply a view that the dead man Plato put in the mouth of the character Socrates?
所以,出于这门课程的目的,我们无需深究,苏格拉底在对话中的某个观点,到底是属于那个真实的受死之人苏格拉底的,还是属于已故之人柏拉图,通过作品中苏格拉底这个角色所表述的
应用推荐