It's a huge book which is all about this short story by Balzac, "Sarrasine," that he begins this essay by quoting.
这本大部头的书都是在讲巴尔扎克的短篇小说《沙拉辛》的,在文章开头他引用道。
Now that's precisely the question that Freud asked himself in Beyond the Pleasure Principle, a text which begins with a consideration of trauma victims.
这就是弗洛伊德,在他的《超越快乐原则》中提到的核心问题,整篇文章以对创伤患者的考虑开始。
Now the part of the essay just prior to this explains that he gave this little quiz that you see to some college students when he was giving a lecture.
在先前已经解释了这篇文章的一部分,他把你们所看到这个小测试在他的讲座上,给一些大学生做了。
Milton brings to his critique of rhyme that same -- and this is familiar - the same political rhetoric that he had brought to his critique of monarchy in the regicide treatises.
弥尔顿对押韵的批判与他--这很相似,-与他在为弑君辩护的文章中,对君主政权的政治批判很相似。
He actually has a publication already in the American Economic Review on the Return to Capital with Ghana.
他曾经在美国经济评论杂志上,发表过文章,研究的是加纳的资本回报
But that may simply be our own prejudice to think that my friend at Peter Simpson the CUNY Graduate Center Peter Simpson has argued in a paper that I found quite convincing that Aristotle had in fact discovered the American Constitution.
但那么想可能只是我们自己的偏见,我任教于,纽约,CUNY,研究中心的友人,他在其文章中主张,而我觉得十分具有说服力,他说亚里士多德,事实上,早就创建了美国宪法。
To give a text an Author is to impose a limit on that text, to furnish it with a final signified, to close the writing.
在创作的时候,作者会给文章加上个限制,他最后会给出一个象征意义来结束写作。
What Gadamer does in his essay is actually an act of intellectual conservatism, it has to be admitted.
伽达默尔在他文章里说的,是思想保守主义的一种表现,这点必需得承认。
Barthes, while writing this--he's writing what has perhaps in retrospect seemed to be his most important book, it's called S/Z.
巴特在创作这篇文章的时候,根据他的回忆这应该是他最重要的一本书,名叫《S\Z》
He would have been what Nietzsche in an interesting precursor text calls "historical man."
他就像是尼采在他的一篇有趣的,有关先驱者的文章里提到的“历史上的人“
There's an orgasmic element in what Derrida has in mind, so that when he speaks of "the seminal adventure of the trace," toward the end of your essay, you want to put some pressure on that word "seminal."
在德里达的思想中有一种兴奋的元素,所以当他在文章结尾处“,说到,“有创意的追溯之旅“时,大家想要将重点放在,“有创意的“上“
It's reasonable, I think, to invoke Dr. Johnson here, Samuel Johnson, who writes in his Life of Milton that Milton's unskillful allegory appears to be one of the greatest faults of the poem.
我认为在这引用塞缪尔·约翰逊的话是很合理的,他一生都在写关于弥尔顿的文章,他指出弥尔顿不熟练的寓言成为了这部诗的大败笔之一。
I think--I have on the syllabus a New York Times article about him.
我在大纲中放了一篇,《纽约时报》上关于他的文章
In other words, here is a moment when Levi-Strauss is admitting something about his own work which he is not admitting in his analysis of the Oedipus myth in the essay from Structural Anthropology that you read last time.
换句话说,在这里,列维承认了,关于自己作品的一些观点,而这些观点,是他在《结构人类学》中的那篇文章中,分析俄狄浦斯神话时所没有承认的,大家上次读过那篇文章。
So Milton explains in The Reason of Church Government -he tries to mend this breach and so he argues in this treatise that "Poetry has" -and I'm quoting him here -"Poetry has a power beside the office of the pulpit."
因此弥尔顿在中解释到,他试图修复自身的这种僭越,因此,他在文章中争论到“,我这里也引用了,“诗歌有着布道论教所不可及的力量“
All right. Now de Man's early career was influenced -I'm not speaking of the very early career in which he wrote these articles, but the early career involving the essays which were collected in his first book, Blindness and Insight.
好了,德曼的早期事业被影响到了,我不是指最早的时期,他写这些文章的时期,而是指收集在他在创作第一本书里的论文的这个事业早期,他的第一本书叫,《盲点与洞见》
This is what he says in this first passage. He says: If we study speech from several viewpoints simultaneously, the object of linguistics appears to us as a confused mass of heterogeneous and unrelated things.
这也是他在第一篇文章里说的话:,我们同时从几个角度读这篇文章,这时语言学乱的像一锅粥,没有系统毫无关联性。
Can you make a novel, as he says in the essay, that will "sprout wings and grow claws" in secret in his mind? That's an image taken from the metamorphosis of the butterfly within the chrysalis.
你能够让一本小说,就像他在那篇文章里说的那样,会在他,脑海里秘密的“展开翅膀,伸出爪子“?,这是从蝴蝶羽化中,借鉴来的比喻。
All right. Now as you read Iser you'll see immediately that in tone, in his sense of what's important, and in his understanding of the way in which we negotiate the world of texts he much more closely resembles Gadamer than Hirsch.
你们在读伊瑟尔时,立马可以感觉到,在他的语气,对重点的把握中,以及他对我们读懂文章的方法上的理解,他更像葛达玛,而不是赫施。
It's possible that he's hiding his talent or burying his conceived merits deep within the earth, and it's this frightening possibility that Milton forces himself to engage head on - the implications of this parable.
他不可能总藏着他的才能,或者把他即将成形的文章埋在地下,就是这种可怕的可能性,使弥尔顿敦促自己注意,这则寓言的暗示。
I think I might want to take it down before he comes.
但在他来之前我得把这篇文章撤掉
应用推荐