So, inside of code, or inside of a script, there's no print, unless we make it explicit.
因此,在代码里面,或者在脚本里面,不会有显示结果的功能,除非我们让它这么做。
So actually, the problem with static semantics is you'd like it to catch everything, you don't always get it.
因此实际上,你希望静态语义检查,能捕获所有的错误,但是经常结果不是这样的。
So I mean, we tried to be as academic about it as possible in trying to think rigorously through the different results that will guide if we go to different directions.
因此,我们一直尝试,以更为学术的姿态,更为严谨的态度来思考,不同的方式,可能产生的不同结果。
And if we were to think about which one of these is better, it turns out that it's the same i in terms of formal charges, so that doesn't help us out.
而如果我们要考虑它们中的哪个更好,结果从形式电荷来看,它们之间没有区别,因此这不能帮我们进行判断。
So thankfully, modern operating systems allow you to put parts of files here, parts of your file here, parts of your file here, but the end result is that your files get fragmented.
因此,谢天谢地,现代操作系统允许你,把这里的文件进行分块,在这里存一部分,在那儿存一部分,但最后的结果是你的文件变成了分片的。
So, when you divide by the mass to get the acceleration, you get the same answer.
因此,当等号两边除以质量来求加速度时,结果是相同的
So what could be our results of movement in 2 decades?
因此,我们的运动能在20年后获得怎样的结果?
So, there would have been a certain amount of just furious killing going on, but I don't think that would have been the way you planned the game.
有些人会因此死于,疯狂的杀戮,但我认为,这并不是战争想要达成的结果
Each person who wants to borrow has to be met by somebody else who wants to lend, so the interest rate that we have in society is the compromise.
想借钱的人必须找到,愿意放贷的人,因此社会中的利率是各方协调的结果
If this was a sickle patient, so they had this gene instead it wouldn't get cut and when I went to look for that presence of that gene on this gel, it would appear as one large segment instead of a large one and a smaller one.
而如果是个镰状红细胞贫血的病人,他们的基因是不会被限制酶切割的,因此他们基因的凝胶电泳结果就不会呈现,一大一小的结果,而只有一个大的片段
We want a relationship in p-V space, not in T-V space. So we're going to have to do something about that. But first, it turns out that now we have this R over Cv.
我们想要p-V空间中的结果,而不是T-V空间中的,因此需要做一些变换,先来看现在的关系,它跟R/Cv有关。
The only place q1 appears here is here, so when I differentiate again I'm going to get -2b and sure enough that's negative, which is what I wanted to know, just to check that when I'm finding this thing, I'm finding a maximum and not a minimum.
只有这一处有q1,因此二阶导数是-2b,它肯定是个负数了,这正是我们想得到的结果,这就验证了我们刚才得出的,是最大值而不是最小值
So when someone comes to me, and they're about to do a test, I ask them, what do you expect your program to do?
因此当很多人找到我想要,做一次实验的时候,我问他们你期待你,的程序返回什么结果呢?
It's called this just because it's an electron that results when an electron absorbs a photon's worth of energy, so thus it's a photoelectron.
之所以这样称呼是因为,当一个电子吸收,一个光子的能量的结果,因此它是一个光电子。
How likely are all the inputs, are they all equally likely, or are they going to depend on other things? And that may depend on the user, so you can't kind of get at that.
他们大致相同么?,他们依赖于其他事情么?,输入也跟用户有关,因此你没法完全得出结果来。
And therefore, they are not systematic about interpreting the results.
预期的正确实验结果,因此,他们就没法做到系统化的去分析结果了。
So that means that we don't have to worry about things like wave functions when we're talking about Lewis structures, but because they're so simple to use and because they so often predict the electron configuration of molecules accurately, we end up using them all the time in chemistry, so it's very valuable to know how to draw them correctly and to know how to work with them.
因此这也就意味着我们在讨论路易斯结构的时候,不需要担心波函数之类的东西,但是由于路易斯结构不仅简单易用,而且用它来预测分子的电子排布,经常可以得到非常精确的结果,结果我们在化学中一直都在用它,因此知道如何正确地画出并运用,路易斯结构是非常有价值的。
The highest occupied orbital is now the 2 s orbital, 1 s 2 2 s 1 so we're going to end up with boron 2 plus 1 s 2, 2 s 1, plus the electron coming out of there.
现在最高的被占据轨道是,2,s,轨道,因此结果应该是正二价的硼,再加上一个出射的电子。
p1/p2 So, the nRT's cancel, and we have p1 over p2.
因此nRT相消,结果就是。
Now if you're at the temperature which is b higher than the inversion temperature, in that case here, a over RT is small compared to b, and this is going to turn out to be negative.
T>Tinv】,这时a/bR小于,结果是负数,因此如果温度。
Which is sort of the question we'd immediately like to ask. Instead, I asked why did it produce the result it did. So I'm not asking myself what's wrong? Or how could I make it right?
其实这个问题我们马上就要问,我问了为什么它会返回这样的结果,因此我并没有去在意哪儿错了,或者我该怎么改正它,我在意的是它?
And it's called divide and conquer for the obvious reason. I'm going to divide it up into sub-problems with the hope that those sub-problems get easier. It's going to be easier to conquer if you like, and then I'm going to merge them back. Now, in the binary search case, in some sense, this is a little bit trivial.
因此被称为分治的原因就这么简单,将一个问题分解成一些子问题,并希望这些子问题解决起来比较方便,正如你希望的,求解的过程也会变得简单,下面就是把结果合并起来,现在,在二分搜索的例子里,从某些方面来说,这有点微不足道。
So if this is true do something else, true otherwise test and see if this is true, do something else, as many as I like followed by the end.
因此如果结果为true那么做一些操作,否则的话再看看这个表达式的值是不是,如果是的话做另外一些操作,我想要多少后面就可以跟多少。
So in this experiment here, delta p is less than zero. You need to have this whole thing greater than zero. So delta T is less than zero as well. So if you're below the inversion temperature and you do the Joule-Thomson experiment, you're going to end up with something that's colder on this side than that side.
所以在这个实验中,Δp小于零,这全部都大于零,因此ΔT也小于零,所以如果在低于转变,温度的情况下做焦耳-汤姆孙实验,最后的结果是,这边的温度比这边低。
So you can imagine that this is a very powerful mechanism. So let's look what happens when I run-- start to run this.
因此你可以想到这是一种很强大的机制,让我们看看让我开始运行,这个程序的时候会有什么结果。
All right. Second question: or maybe a better way of saying this, and the general format you're likely to see here is, a test involving a variable name, which must be initialized outside of the loop, and which interior to the loop gets changed, so that the test is going to change.
好,第二个问题:,换种更好的方式来说吧,你们通常喜欢的,方式是,这个测试涉及到一个变量名字,变量在循环外已经被初始化,然后循环内部会改变这个变量的值,因此测试结果会改变。
In either case, I take that value and multiply back by two, if it was even I get back the original number, if it was odd, I'm not going to get back the original number, so I can just check to see if they're the same.
在两种情况中,我都把结果值,再乘以2,如果x是偶数我就,得到了原来的值,如果x是奇数那么就不会得到,原来的值,因此我看看得到的值,和原来的值相等不相等就可以了。
应用推荐