So hermeneutics will be our first topic, and it attempts to answer the last question that I've mentioned which is raised by theory of literature.

所以诠释学，是我们的第一个话题,它试图回答的是我在探讨文学理论时提出的最后一个问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

We were satisfied with the dialogue that was taking place and we asked students to answer one question, and then comment on the response of another student.

我们对学生之间的谈话,很满意,他们被要求回答问题，然后对另一个同学的,回答作出评价。

麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

That might be a question you might wanna answer or you might wanna say, is the thing on the left and the thing on the right both true?

这可能是一个,你得到回答的问题，你还可能会问是不是左边的和右边的都是真的？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So let me turn to a different approach to solving the question, answering the question,which one should we believe?

所以让我用另一个方法来解决这个问题，回答该相信哪一个理论的问题？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

We can move things around and it's far more exciting for me to answer your questions than to have a monologue.

我们可以稍作调整,而且回答你们的问题,要比我这一个人干讲有意思多了

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

A famous mathematician once said "Every question must have a correct answer " for every question one answer."

一位著名的数学家曾说过,“每一个问题都必定有一个正确的答案,每一个人们所回答的问题“

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

We would hire one other programmer to work on the client's site and build a hardware out, I would build the server software and then answer that question.

我们计划雇佣另一个程序设计师来做,客户网站，再准备好硬件，我还会编出一个服务器软件,一个月后，我们就会回答那个问题。

斯坦福公开课 - Twitter之父Jack.Dorsey演讲：好奇和灵感的力量课程节选

Then they said, I'm going to ask you a question but before you answer the question I'm going to spin a wheel of fortune.

他们说,接下来我要问一个问题,但是在你们回答之前,我会转幸运轮盘

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Sort of the original argument that I made in the very first question you asked.

正如我对第一个问题的回答。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

And the other person has to answer the questions.

另一个人就要回答这些问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

It sounds like a hifalutin phrase you use when you're trying to persuade a VC to fund you. Right So to answer this, we really have to ask a different question, a related question; so, what's computation?

这听着很像当你试图,让VC语言帮你的时候说的大话,对，所以为了回答这个问题，我们需要提出一个难题，一个有关的问题；,因此，什么是计算相关呢？？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

In political philosophy it is never a sufficient answer to answer a question with a statement " "because Plato says so " " or "because Nietzsche says so."

对于政治哲学而言,答案永远都嫌不充足,无法仅用一段陈述来回答一个问题,“因为柏拉图如是说“,“因为尼采如是说“

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

I suppose there's a further question we have to ask, are there things that would be worth doing precisely ? because of the fact that they introduced the risk of death?

我假设我们还有一个更深层的问题要去回答，有没有事情是值得去做的正是因为,它们会带来死亡的风险？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So a lot depends, to answer your question, how one defines autism, and whether one includes Asperger syndrome, which is a limited, a more mild syndrome, as a form of autism.

所以要回答你的问题,就需要看看一个人是如何定义孤独症的,以及一个人是否将,轻微有限的阿斯伯格综合症,看做是孤独症的一种形式

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

And to answer that question, Hobbes tells a story.

为了回答这个问题，霍布斯讲了一个故事。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

You cannot answer that, even if I promised to move only along the x-axis, because I think...I don't want to pose this as a question, because I think the answer is fairly obvious to everybody.

即使我保证只在 x 轴上移动,你们仍然无法回答,因为我觉得...我不想将其作为一个问题,因为我认为答案是显而易见的

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选