But those human laws are only legitimate if they respect our natural rights, if they respect our unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property.

但这些人类法律合法的唯一前提,就是尊重我们的自然权利，尊重我们不可剥夺的生命，自由和财产权。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Natural right is mutable because different circumstances will require different kinds of decisions. So does this mean then that for Aristotle there are no universally valid ? standards of justice or right?

自然权利是易变的，因为不同的情况,将需要不同种的决策,这是否就意谓着亚里士多德,认为没有寰宇合法的,正义与权利标准？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

If the right to private property is natural, not conventional, if it's something that we acquire even before we agree to government, How does that right constrain what a legitimate government can do?

如果私有财产是与生俱来的，而非约定俗成，如果这是在我们同意组建政府前就拥有的，这个权利又如何能限制合法政府的行为呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Take our founding documents " the Declaration of Independence the Constitution all men are created equal that we are endowed with inalienable rights that all legitimate government grows out of consent and the like.

举我们的建国文件,“独立宣言,“宪法“来看，所有人生而平等,我们与生俱来不容剥夺的权利,这是所有合法政府,都认同的概念。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

On the one hand, we have these unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property, which means that even we don't have the power to give them up, and that's what creates the limits on legitimate government.

一方面，我们有不可剥夺的生命，自由和财产权，这意味着即使我们自己也无权放弃，正是这些权利，造成了对合法政府的限制。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选