It's very simple. It's this: if I know what I'm doing, it is almost inevitably the case that you would know also.
实际上十分简单:,如果我知道我创作的是什么,那么你很可能也知道我创作的内涵。
and then one day I'll be like, "Oh, I want to dress like a clown today, so I will."
而可能有时候,我想,“喔,今天我想打扮成一个小丑,然后我就这么做了。”
So although of course it's true, when I imagine these various possibilities without me, I'm thinking about them. I'm observing them.
所以即便真的,当我想象这些没有我存在的可能的时候,我同时也在观察着这些可能。
For example, I could believe that it's twice as likely that the person's going to choose Left as Right.
比方说,我可能认为对手选左的可能性,是选右的可能性的2倍
It could be me that-- my cabin could burn down and I would freeze to death in the winter.
因为也许中招的会是我-,我的房子可能被烧毁,冬天我可能会被冻死。
I will then judge and then the winner will win some small prize, either of a literary or a food nature.
我来评谁胜出,胜出者有一个小奖品,可能是书,也可能是吃的。
What I just spent many lectures discussing is the fact that we can not know how far away an electron is from the nucleus, so we can't actually know the radius of a certain atom.
我花了这么多课时所讨论的正是我们,不可能知道电子离原子核有多远这一事实,因此我们不可能知道某个原子的半径。
- But there's one potential gotcha here -- and this is where you have to be kind -- of piecing together the little clues along the way -- what have I done that's interesting here that had I not, I would have had a mathematical error?
但是这里有一个可能性-,这就是你需要把,一些线索拼凑在一起-,我这里所做的是很有趣的,如果我不这样做,我可能已经犯了个数学错误?
You could say, I could have zero chickens and 20 pigs, does that work? I've got one chicken and nineteen pigs, does that work?
为什么简单列举出所有可能的情况,再一个来检验?你可能会说,我可以有0只鸡和20只猪,这能行吗?
My mom may take a taxicab in New York City and may touch my software or buy a ticket to Alcatraz and may touch my software.
我母亲可能会在纽约城里坐出租车,这就可能会接触到我的软件,或是买票去阿尔卡特拉兹时接触到我的软件。
Whatever virtue of my writing might have it will be, because of values, those individual perceptions Sometimes I'm wrong, sometimes I'm right, but they are my perceptions.
不管我的写作可能有什么优点,由于价值观,及个人的观念,有时候我错了,有时候我对了,但那些都是我的观念。
So I went by night and fought against it from the break of dawn until noon, taking it and slaying all 7000 men, boys, women and girls and maid servants, for I had devoted them to destruction for the god Ashtar Chemosh", referring to herem. It is likely that such claims are hyperbolic in Moab and it is likely they were hyperbolic in Israel.
我连夜赶路,与它战斗,从破晓到正午,拿下了它,屠杀了全部7000个长幼男人和女人,还有女仆,我奉献他们给阿斯塔基摩神,这便是祭祀,这些很有可能是摩押的假设,他们在以色列也很有可能是虚构的。
And I still have that question So that's something that kind of troubles me I had not seen the Afghan National Army as being national as much as I wanna it to be Yeah. Therefore when the time comes they may not do what President Karzai wants them to do?
我始终没搞清楚这个问题,这个问题一直困扰着我,我没有看到过阿富汗国防部队,如我所期待的那样具有民族意识,所以如果在危难时刻,他们有可能不听从卡尔扎伊的指挥?
When it comes to the dangers that I might have faced when it came to going down a more destructive path.
当我在书中谈到我可能遇到的危险时,当我谈到走上一条更具毁灭性的道路时。
For example, I might believe that it's equally likely that they choose Left and Right, is that right?
举个例子吧,我可能认为他选择,左和右的可能性是相同的,对吗
But that doesn't show that it's really possible, logically possible to have a world in which my mind exists and my body doesn't."
但这并不表示那是真正可能的,在逻辑上可能有一个世界,其中我的心灵存在而身体不存在
Again, I don't have data to back this up, but just common sense suggests to me that the common case is if I'm on the subway platform I want to get on that train and maybe I want to get back and where are those two buttons, right?
此外,我没有数据来备份这个,但是常识告诉我,常见的情况是,如果我站在地铁站台上,我想乘上地铁,可能我还想回来,那么哪里能找到这两个按钮,对不?
Right. It's a slight lie, it doesn't have all possible values, but you get the idea. It has, if you like, intellectually, all possible values.
我撒了个小谎,这个空间并没有包含所有的可能的值,你们懂的,理性点说,如果你喜欢,我这么说的话,它包括了所有可能的值。
Now, some of you who are very cynical and/or very good looking might wonder "yes, but good-looking people like me actually are smarter, more competent, more social and morally better."
有些持怀疑态度,同时可能又长得很好看的同学可能会想,“像我这样长得好看的人确实更聪明,更有能力,更会交际,更有道德“
Because it's possible,logically speaking, that there could be cases in which I survive, but I don't have what I normally have when I survive, and so I don't have what matters.
因为可能从逻辑上来说,可能会有这样的案例,我存活下去,但并没拥有我活着时有的东西,不再拥有我在意的东西。
Let me show you an example of the first possibility, because that's the one I think we may be overlooking when we assume that disregarding can't ever make any sense.
让我给你们一个第一种可能的例子,因为我认为我们可能会忽视它,当我们假设无视根本说不通时。
Second thing we've got to worry about is, what's a basic step? All right, if I bury a whole lot of computation inside of something, I can say, wow, this program, you know, runs in one step. Unfortunately, that one step calls the Oracle at Delphi and gets an answer back. Maybe not quite what you want.
我们需要担心的第二件事情就是,什么该作为一个基本的步骤呢?,如果我把一大堆的计算过程放到里面,我可以说,噢,这个程序你知道的,一步就完成了,不幸的是,这一步可能要靠预言家才能得到答案,这可能跟你想要的结果不太相同吧。
Only the operating system has controlling of byte zero NULL in the computer's RAM and so if a function ever returns null, aka zero, well, something must have gone wrong because that can't possibly belong to me that memory because by human convention zero is owned by the operating system; not by a program I wrote.
只用操作系统在内存中能够控制,字节0,并且如果一个函数返回,或者说0,好的,可能出错了,因为那可能是不属于我的内存,因为惯例上,0是由操作系统拥有的,而不是由我的程序拥有的。
if your friend asked to borrow $100 from you, ... you would probably not say-- you might actually put interest on this person, so you could say, alright, I'll do it with 5% interest, pay me back in a year.
你的朋友向你借100美元,你可能不会说-,你可能会对他收取利息,因此你没准会说,好吧,我要收5%的利息,一年之后连本带利还我。
Or one of my favorite examples, you could be sitting in your-- you read this sort of thing in the newspaper periodically-- you could be sitting in your living room when suddenly an airplane crashes into your house, killing you.
或者像我最喜欢用的一个例子那样,你可能坐在你-,你按时读报纸之类的东西-,你可能正坐在你家起居室里,这时突然有架飞机撞进了你家,杀死了你。
Still, at least the possibility that we could work these out is still there, so I suppose there is still at least the possibility that bodily resurrection would be coherent, in such way there would still be the same body.
至少还存在解答这些,问题的可能性,我认为至少还存在,这种可能性,肉体复活是存在的,这样的话就会产生原来的肉体。
OK. Note, by the way, if I chase through each possible path, like there's some IFs in here, if there's some places to go, at least in this piece of code, every possible path through this code ends in a return. And that's a good programming discipline, to make sure that happens.
注意一下,如果我跟进每一条可能的路径,像是这里的,起码在这段代码中就有很多走向,这段代码中的每一条可能路径,在结尾都会返回一个值,这就是一条很好的编程定律,请确保这样做。
Well,at first glance,you might think the answer is, look,you exist,you're alive,whatever it is--; as I said,I'm just going to be loose now, I'm going to put aside all the careful distinctions I just drew-- I'm still around as long as my body is P-functioning.
一开始,你可能会觉得答案是这样,你存在就是存活,无论;,我现在稍微放松一点规定,我要把刚才提出的区别放在一边-,只要我的身体还有人格功能我就是活着的。
This is generally the general introduction of the brain that I wanted to provide, giving the framework for what I'll be talking about later on throughout the course so that I might later on make reference to neurons or neurotransmitters or the cortex or the left hemisphere and you'll sort of have the background to understand what I'm talking about.
以上这些就是我所要讲的,关于大脑的综述,为我以后要讲的课程,建立起框架,往后我可能会提到神经元,神经递质,大脑皮层,或是大脑左半球,而拥有了背景知识的你们,便能够理解我在讲些什么
应用推荐