-
But, what is that larger mystical body?We have been given one candidate: that it's America, that it's somehow America.
但这个更大的神秘主义主体是什么？，我们能够从文中：,找到的一个可能性是，美国，可以说是美国。
-
It's a really fun gig, so to speak.
可以说是一个很有趣的工作。
-
And so this is really a mechanical term, if you like, and this is electrostatic or coulombic.
所以说这真算是一个力学问题，你愿意的话，也可以说它是,静电学或库仑定律方面的问题。
-
If we know that this is it the dissociation energy for a hydrogen atom, we can also say the bond strength for hydrogen molecule 424 is 424.
如果我们知道了这是一个氢分子的离解能,那么我们也可以说氢分子的键的强度,就是。
-
Because it's the same actor who plays the Beast Avenant, and then again Prince Charming I had a question ? That's OK?
因为演野兽,阿瓦南，还有王子的都是同一个演员,我有一个问题,可以说么？
-
PROFESSOR 2: -- other, it could have said - who or zort or -- PROFESSOR: Yeah, sorry, that was part of the question, I could have a picked foobar could put anything in here.
教授2：另外一个对象？,这可以说是其他对象或者-,教授：对，很抱歉，这是问题的一部分，我可以写一个,可以放进任何东西的代用符。
-
I think the genius of this parable hinges on the fact that the servant who was only given one talent seems to be acting so perfectly reasonably - with a laudable form of caution and hesitation, you could actually say.
我认为这则寓言的特别之处在于,那个只拿到一个金币的仆人,的行为是很合理的,-可以说是令人称赞的小心和犹豫。
-
So what syncopation is is simply the insertion of an impulse, a "Hit" If you will, at a metrical place that we do not expect it to be.
所以切分音就是插入的一个冲动,也可以说是一次"撞击",出现在一个我们意料之外的位置
-
One of them,by the way,just about ten years ago, the Orleanist family suffered kind of an embarrassing reversal when one of the Orleanists, sort of the third in line if there was ever an Orleanist restoration of the throne,was arrested for burglary, as being an accessory for burglary in the Pyrenees-Orientales.
顺便说一说,在十年前,奥尔良家族遭受了令人尴尬的霉运,这些儿子中的一个,如果奥尔良家族复辟的话,可以说是第三顺位继承人,他因为盗窃被捕,在东比利牛斯省因为盗窃同谋被捕
-
When you declare a pointer yourself manually, you do say char * the variable name because recall that's the same thing that we did earlier but we called it instead string.
当你手动声明一个指针是，你可以说char，*，变量名字,因为那是我早些时候做的事情,但是我们叫它为字符串。
-
- Now that's a slight lie-- or actually in these days of political debates, a slight misspeaking, a wonderful word-- -- it is technically correct. It is enough to allow us to write any program, but it's not enough to allow us to easily write any program.
现在还有点说谎的感觉,或者在这些强调政治辩论的日子中，可以说成是有些词不达意-,这是一个绝妙的形容词,在语义上是完全正确的，用这种语言我们可以编写任何程序,但是不能轻松地编写程序。
-
They are instances of a class, and associated with that class is a set of methods.
它们是同一个类的实例，与这个类相关联的是一个方法集,因此例如，我可以说。
-
And so similarly as Gmail's priority inbox, it's gonna be pretty flawed for a lot of us at least initially because it just doesn't know the answers a priori correctly unless we teach it or program it to be better. There is also another flaw in here or multiple flaws arguably.
类似于Gmail的优先收件箱，在起初使用时对大多数人来说它是有缺陷的,因为它不知道如何正确判断优先级,除非我们事先告诉它或编写程序改良它,另外这里存在一个或多个漏洞，可以说是缺陷。
-
Basic idea, before I even look at the code, is pretty simple. If I've got a list that is sorted, in let's call it, just in increasing order, and I haven't said what's in the list, could be numbers, could be other things, for now, we're going to just assume they're integers.
我们可以说基本的思想是很简单的,如果我有一个排好序的数组，让我们认为这个数组是递增的吧，我并没说数组里元素是什么，可能是数字，也可能是其他的东西，现在我们假设是integer类型的数字吧，最简单的方式就是这么做了：
应用推荐