What I want to say is, the short answer for now is, I don't think it follows automatically.

我想说的是,简单的解释为,我不认为可以顺理成章得出结论

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, should we conclude, therefore, so nobody really believes that they're ever in dreamless sleep?

那么我们就应该得出结论，没有人真正相信,他们可以进入无梦的睡眠么？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And we could perhaps draw two conclusions from this.

从中，我们可以得出两个结论。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

We can say this in two different ways.

我们可以从两个方面得出此结论。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

And I have here two ways you could learn from looking.

你可以通过两种方法,从注视这个动作中得出一些结论

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So, in fact, it is true, it is in fact true, so we can conclude that 2 dominates in fact, we can do a bit better than that we can say strictly dominates 1.

事实的确如此,我们可以得出结论立场2优于立场1,或者更进一步说,立场2严格的优于立场1

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

What can I conclude?

那我现在可以得出什么结论

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Harmony is not invisible in the relevant sense, so it could still be true that invisible things can't be destroyed, since the soul is invisible in that sense, it would follow the soul can't be detroyed.

和声在这个意义上不是无形的，所以无形的东西不能毁灭,仍然可以是正确的，因为灵魂在这个意义上仍是无形的，你可以得出灵魂不能毁灭的结论。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So dispite the fact that Socrates draws this weaker conclusion, it seems to me that the argument he'd offered us, if it works at all, entitles us to draw the bolder conclusion not the soul is indestructible or nearly so, but the soul is indestructible.

因此即便苏格拉底得出的,这个结论力度弱些,我觉得如果这个论证过程可用，那就可以得出更大胆的结论,不是灵魂几乎不可摧毁,而是灵魂不可摧毁。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

If I can tell a story in which A exists and B doesn't exist, it's got to follow that A and B are not the same thing.

如果我跟你说A存在但B不存在,就可以得出结论A和B不是一个东西

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选