Alright, we are back so we just wrote a programming pseudocode or walk through a programming pseudocode.
继续上课,刚才我们只写了一个伪代码,或者说简单地过了一下。
So I just buy a lot of simple vegetables and fruits.
所以我只买一些简单的蔬菜和水果。
Finally, if this was all there it might be a simpler world, but Freud had a third component, that of the superego.
最后,如果只存在自我和本我,那么事情会简单得多,但弗洛伊德又提出了第三种结构,超我。
So since that's the easiest scenario, you can probably be sure it's not going to be too frequently that you're just given the energy, right, that might be too easy.
所以既然那是最简单的情况,你可以确信只给你提供能量值的,这种情况不太可能发生太多,对,因为那太简单了。
So, long story short after this fairly arcane syntax, the end result is completely straightforward, do the following 10 times.
如此看来,这个长篇故事经过这个奇异的语法规则,简化后就立马简单明朗了许多,只需要重复做10次就OK了。
Just doing a simple thing, that again come back to Thich Nhat Hanh, talks about when you're feeling some pain, or stress, anxiety, put your hands over your heart, and breathe and say "I care for your pain and I care for your suffering."
只做一件简单的事,正如一行禅师所说,感受到痛苦,压力,焦虑时,感受到痛苦,压力,焦虑时,双手交叉,放在心口上,呼吸,自言自语道,“我在乎你所受的痛苦和煎熬“
So all we're doing here is the most quick and superficial glance.
所以对它们我现在只做一个,最简单,最浅层次的分析
Right now, this is the simple law.
目前只讨论简单情形
But for now let's simply say that we have a diffraction which we know occurs only by wave-like behavior and it involves the use of x-rays. Why x-rays?
但现在让我们来简单假设一下,我们知道,只波才发生衍射,而且衍射涉及了X光的使用,为什么是X光?
But of course, if you were a simple perceptual creature, you would just see that there'd be a bar on top and a bar on the bottom.
如果你只是个拥有感知的简单生物,你只会看到在顶端和底端分别有一根木杆
It looks like we're dwelling on only the most simple.
我们只阐述一些极为简单的例子。
I'm simply saying swap X with Y, but this 2 won't work, because where are X and Y defined?
我只简单地说交换X和Y,但是这两行不起作用,因为X和Y是在哪里定义的呢?
Different Jews have different opinions about how that works and the past few centuries have been an interesting experiment with modernity and how Jew is gonna face that and react to it So that's sort of just a brief introduction to Orthodox Judaism.
不同的犹太人有着不同的看法,那是如何实现的,而且过去的几百年,就是对现代性一个很有趣的实验,也是对犹太人将如何,面对并且回应它,这只称得上是,对犹太教正统派的简单介绍。
it's an easy calculation -- we're just taking the negative of the binding energy, again that makes sense, because it's this difference in energy here. So what we get is that the binding energy, when it's negative, the ionization energy is 5 . 4 5 times 10 to the negative 19 joules.
这个计算很简单-我们,只需要取结合能的负值,同样这很容易理解,因为这就是这的能量差,所以我们得到的就是结合能,当它取负值,电离能就是5。45乘以。
and much easier. But when we look at even within women's rights, can you give a brief assessment of how you think this places out in our own context, in American context, like the competing claims of human rights and religious rights?
对的,如果只看女权这个方面,你能给我们简单地说说,这在美国国内是如何进行的吗?,就如之前说人权,与宗教的冲突那样?
In many moods--at least,when I think about not the simple, the ordinary David Smith case with a single belief or two, but the full bodied--that's a bad term-- the full blown Napoleon case with all the memories,all the beliefs.
至少我想到的不是,这个简单的只拥有一两个信念的案例,而是完全的,不该这么说-,完整的拥有全部记忆和信念的拿破仑。
应用推荐