We said players should never play a strategy that's never a best response to anything, so we threw those away.
我们学到了参与人不应该选择,非最佳对策的策略,应该剔除它们
Player II has three choices, this game is not symmetric, so they have different number of choices, that's fine.
参与人II有三种选择,这个博弈不是对称的,所以他们可选策略数量不同,这无所谓
And if Player I chooses bottom, then center yields 2, right yields 0: 2 is bigger than 0 again.
如果参与者I选择下,选中的收益是2,选右的收益是0,2大于0
Player II has three choices left, center, and right, represented by the left, center, and right column in the matrix.
参与人II有三种选择,左中右,用矩阵的左中右三列来表示
So if Player I chooses S1*, Player II will want to choose S2* since that's her best response.
所以当参与人I选择S1*时,参与人II就会选择最佳对策S2
If Player II is playing S2*, Player I will want to play S1* since that's his best response.
如果参与人II选择S2,参与人I就会选最佳对策S1
If Player I chose top, center yields 3, right yields 0: 3 is bigger than 0.
如果参与者I选择上,选中的收益是3,选右的收益为0,3大于0
For instance, if Player II picks left then Player I wants to pick bottom, but if Player II picks center, Player I wants to pick center.
例如,参与者II选择左,参与者I会选择下,但是若参与者II选择中,参与者I会选择中
So here Player I's strategy set, she has two choices top or bottom, represented by the rows, which are hopefully the top row and the bottom row.
这是参与人I的策略集合,她有上下两种选择,用横排来表示,即上下两排
Imagine you're Player I in this game, what do you think you'd do?
现在假设你就是参与人I,你认为你应该怎么选择呢
This is the payoff to Player I of choosing Middle against Left.
这条线表示参与人I在对手选右时,选择左而获得的收益
It involves two players and we'll call the Players I and II and Player I has two choices, top and bottom, and Player II has three choices left, center, and right.
此博弈有两个参与人,分别为I和II,参与人I有两个选择,上和下,参与人II有三个选择,左中右
The highest Player II ever chooses is 2, and the highest response that Player I ever makes to any strategy 2 or less is 6/4, so all these things bigger than 6/4 can go.
参与人II最大只会选策略2,参与人I针对这种情况下,最大只会选择6/4,即大于6/4的策略也会被剔除
So here's the straight line, and this line is the expected payoff to Player I from choosing Down as it depends on the probability that the other person chooses Right, and then once again, we can write down the equation.
这就是第三条直线了,它表示参与人I选择下获得的收益,是另一个参与人,选右概率的一个函数,对于这一条直线,我们依然能够给出方程式
So to say it in words, Player i's strategy "s'i" is strictly dominated by her strategy "si," if "si" always does strictly better -- always yields a higher payoff for Player i -- no matter what the other people do.
用文字来描述就是,参与人i的策略s'i严格劣于si,如果si总是更好的选择,即总能给参与人i带来更高的收益,而无论其他参与人怎么选
应用推荐