But it is the case that they're dominated once we delete the dominated strategies: once we delete 67 and above.
但一旦我们剔除了原劣势策略,即选择67及大于67的数之后,他们才是劣势策略
We thought that the Taliban will be reduced to a minor irritating factor within 6 months to a year.
我们原以为,在六个月到一年之内塔利班分子会减少成为一个很小的势利。
And if we do, in fact, hit it with light to get the electrons off, it will go back to the straight up in position, or if it gets knocked hard enough it does that, too.
而且如果我们这么做,事实上,用光轰击它以逐出电子,它就会在原位置沿直线返回,或者如果它被撞击的足够猛烈,也会出现上述现象。
And we'll look back maybe and see how that difficult text would've looked in its original context.
我们会倒回去看看这一不同文本,在其原背景下是什么样的。
Okay, so when you are working with source material that looks like this, there is in fact no such thing as infinite zoom in computer science.
当我们处理,这样的原数据时,事实上计算机科学中,并不存在无限放大。
We tend to think of the separation of powers doctrine as necessary for the security and liberty of the individual ? don't we?
我们倾向于,将分权原理想成是,个人安全与自由的必备条件,不是吗?
So, there is a way to go from the unprimed coordinates to the prime coordinate by rotating your axis and actually calculating the components.
现在我们有一种方法可以从原坐标系,转变到新坐标系,只要旋转坐标轴,并实际地计算一下坐标即可
So these strategies -- let's be careful here with the word weakly here -- these strategies are not weakly dominated in the original game.
所以这些策略,对于这里的弱一词,我们要谨慎对待,这些策略在原博弈中并不是弱劣势的
Now, we're going to listen to a piece of music here from the tradition of classical India and I thought we might have a sitar player in here.
现在,我们要听一段,传统的印度古典音乐,我原以为我们能请来一位锡塔尔琴手
Those receptors are more complicated than the ones we thought about before.
受体比我们原想的,复杂的多得多
So, here's magnesium. It's very light.
我们回到原题,这是镁,它很轻。
Second thing they're going to do is let us suppress detail. And in essence what that does is, the functions, and we're going to look at a bunch of examples in a second, these functions are going to give us a way to, in some or in one way of thinking about it is to create new primitives.
第二件要做的事,是忽略细节,函数的本质到底是什么,我们将在接下来的几分钟,举一些例子,这些函数将给我们提供,一种创建原语的思考方式。
And again, to move back and ask ourselves a larger question, would knowing how much time you have be something that would allow you to actually embrace those choices, ? or would it instead just be a burden?
再一次,回到原题,问我们自己一个更大的问题,知道自己还有多少时间,是会让你实际上接受这些选择呢,还是只是一个负担?
But they are dominated once we deleted not just the dominated strategies, but also the strategies that were dominated once we deleted the dominated strategies.
但是当我们我们,剔除原博弈中的劣势策略以及,第一次剔除之后仍处于劣势的策略后,它们就又继续成为了劣势策略
The ligands are more complicated than the ones we thought about before.
配体也比我们原想的,复杂的多得多
We all know people who we thought to be our friends but we found out that they were talking behind our backs, or that they were operating to deceive us in some way or another.
我们都知道,原认为是朋友的人,却被发现,在我们背后讲坏话,或是想要,以任何方式欺骗我们之类的事情。
We expect it to sound there.
我们原以为它会在这里出现
It adds fifty percent or a half to that and that means instead of two quarter notes that we now have three and we can do the same thing to any one of these other values here and that's how we get our triple relationships.
加上了百分之五十或者说一半的原音符值,这意味着除了有两个四分音符,我们现在有三个了,我们也可以在其他这些音符值后加上附点,这就是我们如何做到三倍形式的安排的
So now we've ruled out the possibility that anyone's going to choose a strategy 68 and above because they're weakly dominated, and we've ruled out the possibility that anyone's going to choose a strategy between 46 and 67, because those strategies are dominated, once we've ruled out the dominated strategies.
现在因为选择68,及以上的数的策略是弱劣势策略,所以我们已经把它们剔除了,并且我们也排除了有人会,选择46至67之间的数的可能,因为一旦我们剔除原博弈的劣势策略,这些策略也就变成劣势策略了
So the very last two lines of code I'm saying this, s2 the original string is s1, the copy of the string is s2, but if I haven't lost you, what are we really going to see when we print this?
最后两行代码是这样的,原字符串是s1,那个字符串的拷贝是,但是如果我没有忘记,当我们打印的时候,我们将看到什么?
If we did the experiment where on this booster we included not only the initial antigen but some unrelated antigen, the response to the unrelated antigen called B here, looks like a primary response.
如果实验中我们使用的后续疫苗,不仅包括原抗原,还包括一些无关抗原,这里将对无关抗原的应答称为B,该应答就如同初次免疫一样
应用推荐