-
On Tuesday we'll turn to a more specific subject matter: hermeneutics, what hermeneutics is, how we can think about the nature of interpretation.
周二我们会讲到一个更具体的问题：,即解释学，解释学是什么，我们该如何看待解释学的本质。
-
Or in another example, let us look at how we can use the "How can I" pattern in a way where you don't want to answer.
在另一种情况中，我们来看看如何使用“How can I”的第二种意思，即不需要回答的情况。
-
a little of that here with you today, to go over what Aristotle is suggesting in this idea of man, the polis animal.
我只能示范一些给你们看，要如何阅读亚里士多德所提示的概念,即人是城邦的动物。
-
It tells me the other way around to look at how prices correspond to quantities, it tells me the quantity demanded at any given price.
它直观的显示出,价格如何与产量对应,即在给定的价格上需求量是多少
-
But the demonstration also illustrated another fact about language, which is how different languages are.
但这个演示也阐明了语言的另一个事实,即语言如何不同
-
He's interested in the way in which a reader can come to terms with a meaning conveyed by a text, and that much, as I say, despite the profoundly different nature of their projects, Wimsatt and Gadamer have in common.
他只关注读者如何明白,文章的意思，而这也就是，我所说的，文萨特和葛达玛的共同之处，即是他俩在某些领域有本质上的差别。
-
The person who does that best is Michael Pollan, and when you read his book, In Defense of Food, he spends some time in the book defining what food is and working through this--this quagmire of how do we define food and what's acceptable to eat, what's socially acceptable, what's personally acceptable.
这一点上迈克尔·伯伦做得最好,你们可以看看他写的书《为食物辩护》,他在书中给食物下了定义,并深入地探讨了这个难题,即如何区分食物与能吃的东西,社会普遍接受的东西,个人能够接受的东西
-
Maybe the argument goes wrong by assuming that identity--when A is equal to B, it's always equal to B, no matter what.
也许这个论证就错在,假设了同一性,即当A等于B的时候,它总是等于B,无论情况如何
-
We also know how to figure out the energy of this orbital, and we know how to figure out the energy using this formula here, which was the binding energy, -Rh which is negative r h, we can plug it in because n equals 1, so over 1 squared, and the actual energy is here.
我们知道如何算出,这个轨道的能级，而且我们知道如何,用这个公式,算出能量，也即是结合能，等于，我们把n等于1代进来，所以除以1的平方，这就是能量。
-
We've talked about one the main concepts in physiology being homeostasis, that is 'how do you maintain a constant internal environment?
我们讲到了生理学的主要概念,内稳态,即如何维持内环境的稳定
-
And,of course,the challenge -- so this is the latter part of the course-- is what do you do with this and Europe?
当然,质疑是,这部分会在日后课程提到,即该如何处理这和欧洲各国的关系
-
How is Foucault going to mount an argument in which privileged authors -that is to say, figures whom one cites positively and can somehow or another stay in the picture?
福柯又如何为特殊的作者辩护呢,特殊的作者即是经常被一个人引用,这些作家能被辩护吗？
-
If the latter, if this hierarchy of intelligence or this hierarchy of the rational is the result of upbringing, ? then how can slavery be defended as natural?
若是后者，即智慧的阶级制度,或说理性的阶级制度,是教养的结果，那奴役如何能以自然演变加以辩护？
-
But how we want to know does Aristotle reconcile his account of the term baseleia the king of overall with his earlier emphasis upon democratic deliberation and shared rule the citizen recall is one who takes turn ruling and being ruled in turn.
但我们想知道的是亚里士多德,如何调配，Baseleia，宇宙王,与他先前对民主商议与分享统治公民的强调,回想一下，即大家轮流统治,且被统治者相对服从,当读者探究亚里士多德对王权的论述。
应用推荐