Well, the reason, the way that we can check it is just to see if it's in between our two extreme 1 cases. We know that it has to be more than 1, because even if we had total shielding, 1 we would at least feel is the effective of 1.
好的我们可以检查它的原因和方式是观察,它是否在我们的两种极端案例之间,我们知道它必须大于,因为即使如果我们有完全的屏蔽,我们最小感到的有效值是。
So even though it's English, the language is different.
所以即使它都叫英语,但是语言本身还是有区别的。
So if you do include it up top, the subsequent lines, even if you have these curly braces, are not, in fact, going to help you.
所以如果你在前面就包含它,后面的代码,即使你有这些花括号,实际上也没有用了。
If I hadn't written it, I would prescribe it, but that is a little awkward moment.
即使书不是我写的,我也会指定它,但现在会有一点尴尬
So we see that we do not eject electrons in the case of the laser pointer, even if we have this intensity, it is still not related to the energy of an individual photon, so we won't see an effect.
所以我们看到我们用激光笔,还是没有逐出电子,即使我们有这样的强度,它仍然与一个单个的光子能量无关,所以我们不会看到光电效应。
If a cell has a gene that makes it resistant to Ampicillin, that means that that micro-organism can survive being exposed to this normally deadly chemical without dying.
如果细胞带有一种基因,能够让它对氨苄青霉素产生抗性,即使把它放在,有致死剂量化学物质的环境中,它也能存活下来
In other words, a connotation is valuable and ought to be invoked even if it's philologically incorrect if it contributes to the unity, the complex building up of the unity, of the literary text.
也就是说,如果隐含意义是文本更具有一致性,它就是有价值,且值得探究的,即使从语言学角度说,它是不正确的。
And if it's not really invisible, even there is a notion of invisible such are the things that invisible in that sense can't be destroyed, souls are not invisible in that sense.
如果它不是完全无形的,即使有无形的定义,根据定义有些东西是无形的,无形的东西不可毁灭,但是灵魂在这个意义上不是无形的。
Even at=0, and it has an initial velocity, so even without any acceleration, it will be moving from y0 to y0+vt.
即使at=0,它仍然有初速度,因此即使加速度为0,它也会从y0运动到y0+vt
应用推荐