Now I want to contrast that with what we see from Nabokov in this essay, Good Readers and Good Writers.
现在我要把这和《好读者和好作者》这篇文章中,纳博科夫的观点做下比较。
So, where is Nabokov in here? I think that's one of the places where Nabokov is. It's Nabokov meditating on this problem.
那么,在这一段中纳博科夫在哪里呢?我,认为这是他所,存在的一个地方,纳博科夫正在沉思这个问题。
The Basel Accord was in 1988 and you can read about this in detail in Fabozzi, et al.
988年签订了巴塞尔协议,你们可以在法博齐的书中读到详细的内容
So, there are multiple ways, at multiple levels, that Nabokov is defending his work in this afterword. For one thing, he insults the publishers.
因此,在这篇后记中,纳博科夫在多种不同层面上,为他的作品辩护,一方面,他侮辱他的出版商。
There is that physical comedy, and I'll suggest to you that in that sentence, the pushing and pulling, you're seeing part of Nabokov's verbal play.
有着强烈的肢体喜剧色彩,我认为在这句话中,反复出现的推和拉,想你展示了纳博科夫的文字游戏。
Then there's Tier II capital and then they have a formula -now, this is defined in Fabozzi.
然后又有了二级资本金,他们对此有个计算公式,如今,这在法博齐的书中有定义
Don't look this up in Fabozzi because the date of founding was March 11 2008; that's the date that they announced it.
不要在法博齐著作中搜寻,因为它成立于2008年3月11日;,他们宣布的那天。
There's something called "universal life"-- these are all explained in Fabozzi, et al.
还有一种叫做综合性人寿保险,在法博齐的著作中有所提及
In the case of Burt Malkiel's data, more than 11% per year and in the case of Roger Ibbotson's data between 7% and 8% per year of those returns can be explained either by backfill bias or survivorship bias.
在伯特·麦基尔的数据中,超过11%的年平均收益,在罗杰·伊博森的数据中,7%到8%的年平均收益,可以用生存偏差或回填偏差来解释
应用推荐