-
So we can think of this term has to do with complementarity, or synergy, a very unpopular word these days but still: synergy.
因此我们可以把合作理解为互补或协同,虽然协同这个词现在不是很常用了
-
And everything comes, you know, everyone works together, comes together.
事物之间联系起来，人们也需要协同合作。
-
If we lowered the degree of synergy, what would happen to the effort level that we'd find by this method? What would happen?
如果我们降低了协同度,在这种情况下,结果会是什么样的呢
-
They work in concert and they all have similarities, the same with all of our other organs.
它们协同工作,形态相似,我们身体的其他器官也莫不如此
-
We're going to talk about the mechanisms by which these work as well.
我们也会讲到这类协同工作的机理
-
So we're gonna assume that when you work together there're some synergies.
所以我们假设合作中就要有协同
-
So if we lower the synergy here, not only do I contribute less effort, but you know I contribute less effort, and therefore you contribute less effort and so on.
如果我们减少协同参数,不但我会少付出努力,而且你也知道我会少付出努力,因此你也会少付出努力,以此类推
-
The circulatory system which we'll talk about in a couple of weeks, the heart, the blood vessels, and the blood work together to form a totally internal function.
例如过几周我们要讲的循环系统,心脏,血管,血液,三者协同工作,形成一个完全在体内发挥作用的体系
-
It isn't even, by the way, about the synergy.
顺便说一句,它和协同也没什么关系
-
Now, I recognize-- well you should recognize that this is a very simplified view of a highly complex network of interactions that takes place.
我认为,你们应当了解,这只是对一个高度复杂,协同运作的网状工作系统的简单介绍
-
You might think it's because of this synergy that they don't take into account correctly.
你可能认为这是因为,他们没有正确的考虑协同的作用
-
The reason it helps is you're trying to coordinate onto a Nash Equilibrium.
因为你们都想通过协同达成纳什均衡
-
It turns out even without the synergy this problem would be there.
事实证明即是没有协同此问题依旧存在
-
What would happen if we changed the degree of the synergy?
如果我们改变了协同的程度会怎样
-
How do your lungs know what your heart is doing?
你的肺与心脏如何协同工作
-
So this isn't to do with the synergy.
这和协同没有什么关系
-
So B is the degree to which the synergy across these workers, if we lowered B, what would happen to our picture?
表示这些参与人之间的协同程度,如果我把B的值降低,图像会怎么变
-
If Player II chooses 4, then the synergy leads Player I to raise his best response all the way up to 2, but these strategies up here above 2 are never a best response for Player I. Is that right?
如果参与人II选4,协同导致,参与人I的最佳对策变成2,参与人I的那些大于2的策略,也永远不会成为最佳对策,对不对
应用推荐