But, because of the logic of risk management we have to make a deal with them; so, it becomes more formal and impersonal.

但是，基于风险管理的逻辑,我们必须和他们达成协议;,使分摊正规化而不受主观情绪的影响。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

It's also about bank regulation, such as the Basel Accord, Basel I and Basel II.

还会讲到银行监管,比如巴塞尔协议和新巴塞尔协议

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

What about you with your roommates?

那你和你室友是不是可以签协议

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

After the French Revolution and Napoleon, and Napoleon makes peace with the church, there is,all of a sudden, a revival with people forming religious confraternities, of people paying to rebuild churches that have been vandalized during the Revolution, where they're melting down church bells to use as cannon and things like that.

在法国大革命和拿破仑时代,与教会达成和解协议之后,突然间,出现了宗教团体的复兴,人们斥资重建那些,在大革命中被肆意毁坏的教堂,当时人们把教堂大钟熔化了,去造大炮之类的东西

耶鲁公开课 - 1871年后的法国课程节选

They're two water companies, so they're Poland Spring and Coca-Cola I guess these days, sign this agreement saying that each one's going to produce half monopoly quantity and what's going to go wrong with that agreement?

有两家瓶装水公司,比如说波兰泉和可口可乐,他们签署了协议规定,每家都只生产垄断产量的一半,这个协议有什么问题吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Yeah, so maybe even among your roommates, maybe you don't need a contract because you can manage to achieve the same ends, by the fact that you're going to be interacting with the same person, over and over again during your time at Yale.

没错,就算你和室友没有书面协议,你们一样能达到预期的目的,因为在耶鲁大学上学期间,你们总要碰面

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Well, one thing that goes wrong is that suppose Coke and Pepsi were able to either to write a contract or whatever to sustain joint monopoly output at this high price, this price which is actually producing positive profits in the industry it is going to turn out, therefore the price is going to be above costs.

我来说吧,问题出在这里了,假设可口可乐和百事达成了协议,不管签的是协议还是合同,只要能通过协约维持垄断产出,通过制定高价来达到正的利润就行,这样价格是高于成本的

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选