-
One tip about this, try to identify all the dominated strategies of all players before you delete, then delete.
这里有一个窍门,在剔除之前试着找出,所有参与人的劣势策略,然后再剔除它们
-
But it is the case that they're dominated once we delete the dominated strategies: once we delete 67 and above.
但一旦我们剔除了原劣势策略,即选择67及大于67的数之后,他们才是劣势策略
-
Okay. Having said that and pointing out the advantages and disadvantages of notation let's plunge in then to a discussion of it.
好的,既然我们已经提到,并指出了记谱法的优势和劣势,那接下来我们就来对它进行一番讨论
-
One of the concerns out of the gate for students in this course, particularly those we dub less comfortable is that you're already starting off at a disadvantage.
另外一个比较关心的是,还没有入门的同学，尤其是那些有点跟不上的同学,你们的学习处于劣势。
-
If somebody can come at him from this side, he is very vulnerable from there.
如果有人从右侧进攻,那么他将处于劣势
-
Because, if you did, then you would always be dominated.
如果你选了，你就总是处于劣势。
-
So, by putting ourselves in Hannibal's shoes, we could figure out that his hard attack strategy was weakly dominated.
那么我们从汉尼拔的角度来考虑一下,我们发现崎岖之途是弱劣势策略
-
Once you delete the dominated strategies, then you kind of go through it again and then 2 is dominated by 3.
一旦你剔除了劣势策略,再次审视这个博弈时,立场2劣势于立场3
-
So Thomas said something which was true, but it doesn't quite match with the definition of a dominated strategy.
托马斯所说的是对的,但这的确劣势策略的定义不太相符
-
So he says that position 1, strategy 1, choosing the most extreme left wing position is a dominated strategy.
他说到立场1,也就是策略1,即选择最极端的左翼立场,是劣势策略
-
There are ten strategies 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, are any of the strategies dominated?
有10个策略可以选,这里有劣势策略吗
-
We could do that; we could try iteratively deleting dominated strategies and see if that process converged.
可以尝试迭代剔除劣势策略,然后看看会不会趋向于某种结果
-
That's a third of the people who seem to be choosing a dominated strategy or is it?
为什么有三分之一,会选择劣势策略呢
-
So if we do the procedure of iteratively deleting dominated strategies, going back again, looking what's dominated, all that's left is 5 and 6.
如果我们按照这个程序,迭代剔除劣势,不断回头看看那些策略是劣势的,最终将只剩下立场5和6
-
You can work through this game and you can check pretty quickly that nothing is dominated.
当你从头到尾 仔细分析过之后,你会发现这里没有劣势策略
-
But they are dominated once we deleted not just the dominated strategies, but also the strategies that were dominated once we deleted the dominated strategies.
但是当我们我们,剔除原博弈中的劣势策略以及,第一次剔除之后仍处于劣势的策略后,它们就又继续成为了劣势策略
-
The strategies that are less than 67 but bigger than 45, I think these strategies are not, they're not dominated strategies in the original game.
对于选择大于45而小于67的数,我认为他们并不是,在原博弈中并不是劣势策略
-
Alpha was dominant before--it dominated Beta before-- and it still dominates Beta. Let's just check.
是优势策略,β是劣势策略,在这里α依然优于β,我们来验证下
-
So when we looked at domination and deleted dominated strategies, we got nowhere here.
因此当我们寻找并剔除劣势策略时,我们是无从下手的
-
Henry. Henry. So Henry is saying sure i don't have a dominated strategy.
亨利认为我们确实没有劣势策略
-
Now since we think that Hannibal, the attacker, is not going to play a weakly dominated strategy, we think Hannibal is not going to choose the hard pass.
好了,既然我们认为入侵者汉尼拔,不会选择弱劣势策略,我们认为汉尼拔不会选择崎岖之途
-
Actually, they're only weakly dominated but that's okay, they're certainly dominated.
实际上只是弱劣势,但这么说也对,他们当然是劣势的
-
Does 5 dominate 6, or 6 dominate 5, or anything like that?
在选立场5或是6二者中有劣势策略吗
-
Good, so for both players Snow White is a dominated strategy.
没错,《白雪公主》是劣势策略
-
We also saw in that numbers game last time that in some games, but by no means all games, in some games this process actually converges to a single choice.
我们同样可以发现,在某些博弈中,不是所有的博弈,迭代剔除劣势策略,最终会导致唯一的选择
-
One lesson was, do not play a strictly dominated strategy.
其中的一个结论是,不要采用严格劣势策略
-
But to be a dominated strategy we need something else.
想要成为劣势策略还要满足别的条件
-
Delete those. Delete those for everyone else, because everyone else is not going to play a dominated strategy.
应该剔除它们,其他人也会这么做,因为其他人也不会,采用劣势策略
-
So once again what this idea is this idea is you yourself should not play a dominated strategy.
所以再次强调,站在我们自己的立场上说,我们不应采用劣势策略
-
So with apologies to Strunk and White, this is in the passive form, that's dominated, passive voice.
斯特伦克和怀特很抱歉,我用了被动式,即劣势,被动语态
应用推荐