So, why don't you go ahead and take 10 more seconds on this second clicker question for our intro.

请大家再花十秒钟的时间,来做一下第二个选择题。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

With a different volatility for the stocks because that was also selected randomly, plus some market bias.

或者均匀分布的一个随机值,因为数值选择上的随机性，再加上市场偏好。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

We're going to compare this with my payoff from choosing 2 against the other candidate choosing 1.

我们再计算当对手选择立场1时,我选择立场2获得的收益

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

We're actually going to do one more clicker question to get started with today, and as we do, I'll explain something we're going to be trying today, which is a little bit of a friendly competition in terms of answering the clicker questions correctly.

我们将在开始讲授今天的课程之前,再多做一个选择题，我先来说明一下做这件事的原因，这实际上是一个,回答选择题的小比赛。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

So, again, I want to stress you have the option of staying anonymous in this class, but you also have the option of seeking out and making some sort of contact with us.

那么,我再强调一遍,你们可以选择在这门课上默默无闻,但是你们也可以选择站出来,跟我们多多接触

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

One offer of one more idea which is to take a figure who we all know about, but who we view as, maybe a civil rights hero or an African-American hero, or a Christian hero, or an American hero and turn into a global interfaith hero.

再给大家提供一个重要观点,那就是选择一位众所周知的人物，但是我们可能将他视作民权运动英雄,或是非裔美国人英雄，或是基督教英雄，或是美国英雄,然后转变为一位全球跨信仰英雄。

普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

There will be--here's another example of a different kind of article where when you click on the click here for full text option, you get something that looks a little bit different.

再举另外一种文章的例子,当你们点击选择全文时,会看到一些不一样的东西

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

So it's probably not as final line as you might think, at least in my experience and in what I think is the best in government is make your policy choices first and then work out the politics.

所以可能并没有,你说的底线至少在我的经历中没有,我认为对政府最有益的是,先选择好政策,然后再谈政治。

普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

putting all those things together, if you looked at this question again we'd get 100% on it, 0 9 that our only option here is 0. 9, and that it's not the negative, it's the positive version, because we're talking about how much energy we have to put into the system in order to eject an electron.

把这些放在一起，你们再看一下题目,大家100%都能选对，我们唯一的选择就是这个，它不是负数，它是正的，因为我们说的，是要,把电子激发出来,需要提供的能量。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

So just explain what you did and why again.

请再解释一下你的选择及其原因

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Well, a cross-sectional study would mean that you'd get a random group of the population and measure them in 1970 and then take another random group five years later and measure them, but it wouldn't be the same people necessarily, it would be different groups of people.

那么,横断面研究就是,1970年你在人群中随意选择一组人,并记录下相关数据,然后,五年后再随意选择一组人记录数据,但这不需要是同一组人,通常是不同的人

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选