So Christine is correct in saying that once we delete the strategies 1 and 10 once we realize that those positions are not going to be chosen by our sophisticated candidates then we realize that probably choosing 2 isn't a good idea either.

克里斯汀说的很对,一旦我们剔除了策略1和10,一旦我们意识到,不会有人选择这些立场时,我们会发现,选立场2或9可能也不是个好主意了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So if you think people are going to play a particular way, in particular if you think people are going to choose the strategy of Ryan and Chris, and choose around 33, then 22 seems a great answer.

如果你认为大家会按这种方式推理的话,确切地说就是如果你认为大家会依照,瑞恩和克里斯的策略而选择33的话,22看起来是个不错的选择

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So what Christine is arguing is, even though it's the case that 2 is not a dominated strategy, if we do the process of iterative deletion of dominated strategies and we delete the dominated strategies, then maybe we should look again and see if it's dominated now.

克里斯汀说的是,即使选择立场2不是劣势策略,如果我们迭代剔除劣势策略,然后我们剔除掉了劣势策略,然后再来回头看看还有没有劣势策略了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选