For example, say you want to take your neighbor to court, because your neighbor is starting impinging on your land.
比如,你想告你邻居,因为他侵害你的财产。
Then if you fail to pay on the mortgage--pay off the debt -the lender can seize the property and sell it.
然而如果你无法偿还贷款,贷方可以没收这项财产并出售
But at some point you have to understand that the benefits of redistribution of wealth don't justify the initial violation of the property right.
但某种程度上说,你得明白,财富重新分配的好处,并不能为侵犯财产权正名。
You will say that man cannot hold property in man.
也许你会说一个人不能把另一个人当财产
When you mortgage a property that means that you offer the property as collateral for a loan.
当你通过抵押贷款购买一项财产意味着,你需要抵押这项财产的所有权以获得贷款
So even once the majority is in charge, the majority can't violate your inalienable rights, can't violate your fundamental right to life, liberty, and property.
所以即使多数人掌权,多数人也不能侵犯你不可剥夺的权利,不能侵犯你基本的生命,自由和财产权。
On the one hand, he says the government can't take your property without your consent.
一方面,他说,未经你同意,政府不能取走你的财产。
Going back to the first point that you made about the property rights of individual.
回到你最初提到,关于个人财产权的观点。
How would you recommend that investors protect their wealth during this period to ? take advantage of upcoming investment opportunities?
那你对投资者在这段时间内,如何保护他们的财产并且,进一步利用这即将到来的投资机会有什么建议呢?
A mortgage lender doesn't want to lend more than the property is worth because that would mean a loan-to-value ratio over one.
抵押贷款的贷方,借给你的钱不会超过财产本身价值,因此贷款价值比率就会大于1
For example, you can't acquire a land that is common property, so people in terms of the American Indians, I feel like they already have civilizations themselves and they were using land in common.
比如,你不能掠夺公共财产,对于印第安人来说,我觉得他们已经有了自己的文明,他们用的就是公共土地。
For many years now, to qualify as an accredited investor, you have to have one million dollars in wealth or income in excess of $200,000 or, if you're married, $300,000 for the couple.
一直以来,可信投资者的要求是,你必须有一百万美元的财产,或者年收入超过20万美元,若已婚,则夫妇年收入要超过30万
If you look at it that way, then you're violating another one of Locke's treatises, which is that you can't take anything from anyone else.
如果你这么想的话,你就违反了,洛克的另一个论点,就是你不能拿走他人的财产。
.. Because you wouldn't have... You wouldn't be able to make money, you wouldn't be able to own property if there wasn't that socially, like, if society wasn't stable, and that's completely different from religion.
因为你不可能。,如果没有社会条件,如果社会不稳定,你就赚不到钱,更别提拥有财产了,这跟宗教完全是两码事。
It's your wealth.
这些是你的财产。
应用推荐