I would expect, whether you're a Red Sox fan or not, you to be able to look at a list of different pitchers and their average velocity for their fastball, and tell me who has the longest or the shortest wavelength.
无论你是否是一个红袜队球迷,我预想你会看到一系列,不同的投手和他们,投出快球的平均速度,告诉我谁有最长的,或者最短的波长。
But the mere fact that they would change your behavior doesn't yet tell you whether they're reason-generating facts.
但仅仅是它们会改变你的行为这个事实,并没有告诉你它们是否是产生原因的事实。
So, ask yourself frankly especially when it comes to designing your own tools and your own programs whether it's for real users to use, whether it's for your research group to use in some other field, you know, where do you even begin?
坦白讲,问一问你们自己,当你设计一个工具,一个程序时,它是否是为真实用户使用的,还是为在其他领域的,研究团队使用的,你们懂的,你从哪里开始?
A huge one is, are you actually running the code you're looking at in your editor.
一个很大的错误就是你运行的程序,是否是你在编辑器中看到的程序。
It is not all that mysterious how we check out to see whether-- the same body has been around, even though you didn't do it.
究竟我们是如何,检验是否是同样的肉体-,不管你有没有特意去检验,也不像灵魂论那么神秘。
When we're just interacting with idol, with the interactive editor or sorry, interactive environment if you like, that's what you expect. What's happening is that we're typing in something, an expression it doesn't know how to deal. It's raising the exception, but is this simply bubbling up at the top level saying you've got a problem.
就发生了其中之一是吧,当你在交互数据处理或者是在交互编辑器,抱歉,任何你喜欢的交互式环境中,你可能会遇到这些,如果你在输入什么内容,譬如一个它不知道怎么处理的表达式,它就会报一个异常,但这是否是简单的,把你遇到的问题冒到最顶层呢?
The format is the same. I'm going to ask for some input, and then I am going to use that procedure to check, is this the right type of value. And I'm trying to use that to do the coercion if you like. Same thing if it works, I'm going to skip that, if it not, it's going to throw the exception.
格式是一样的,我需要一些输入,然后我要用一个过程来检查,是否是正确的值,然后你就可以做强制转换了,如果能运行,那是一样的,我打算跳过这段,如果不正确,那就会抛出一个异常。
应用推荐