Now, it's interesting because the other four books of the Pentateuch never mention a king. In Genesis through Numbers none of the legal materials say when you have a king this is what he shall do.
有趣的是,摩西五经中的其他四本经书,从来没有提到过国王,从《创世纪》到《民数记》,从没有一份正规的材料说,当你有了一位国王后,这些就是他应该做的事情。
For example, maybe you have a friend who told you to invest in a specific stock
例如,也许你有个朋友告诉你应该投资某一股票。
The idea was you have to do something that has lot more job securities, something that will bring in a steady income.
作为一个穆斯林,你就应该,做一份比较有保障,收入稳定的工作。
And you can imagine this gets complex and there's lots of interesting things to do to look to the real form, but those are the things that you should see.
可以想象下这样下去问题会变的复杂起来,而且当面对真实情况的时候,会有很多有趣的事情发生,但是这些东西你都应该明白的。
If you've read through that material and you should have read through it by now you know that we have a value in music.
如果你通读这个材料,现在你应该也已经通读过了这一部分,你应该知道我们的音乐中有一种音符值
And when somebody else then attacks them, say, "Look, I think that what John was saying was a good point and here's how I think he should have defended his position," or what have you.
并且当其他人攻击他们时,你说听着我觉得约翰说的是个好点子,和这是我认为他应该怎样维护自己的立场“,或者你有什么。
Now, here's another document that you want to be aware of that gives you some idea of what the Greeks fairly early thought the polis was for and about, and what the relationship between individual and polis was.
现在,这有另一份你们应该注意的材料,它能让你了解一些早期希腊人,是如何认识城邦的作用和本质,以及个人与城邦之间的关系的
And also I wanted to mention in terms of checking your Lewis structures, regardless of what they are, you should always go back and I had 10, and then count 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, because you always need to make sure you have the same number of valence electrons that you calculated in your actual structure.
我还想提一点关于检查,你的路易斯结构的建议,不管它们是什么,你总是应该回去检查一下,我有十个,然后数一数,二,四,六,八,十个,因为你总是需要确保实际价电子的数量,与你在结构中算出的数量相等。
So in principle, in that election in 2000, there was at least four candidates, as it were, four things you could do with your vote.
原则上,在2000年那场大选中,应该有四个选举人,因为你可以投出四种选票
So I don't know your mathematical background, but the textbook has an appendix, which is a reasonable measure of how much math you should know.
我不太清楚你们的数学功底,但教材上有附录,它能清楚地告诉你,你应该掌握多少数学
I have medicine in the cabinet, you should take it.
橱柜里有药片,你应该吃点药。
He had a suitcase that--I don't know exactly, something like this--had a strap that you'd pull it along and it had four little wheels on the bottom and it worked.
他的行李箱。。。我知道的不太确切,应该是这样的,那上面有一条带子,你可以拉着它,而箱子底部有四个小轮子可以使箱子滑动。
I would say, people certainly have their views. But I think... You should start.
我会说,每个人都有他们的看法。,你应该先开始。
So how would we go about solving this problem if I told you not only was there a maximum weight, but there was a maximum volume. Well, we want to go back and attack it exactly the way we attacked it the first time, which was write some mathematical formulas.
有些时候两个都重要,所以如果我告诉你这里不仅有,最大重量还有最大容量,我们应该怎么解决这个问题呢?,好了,我们想回过来然后,和第一次一样看看这个问题。
Isn't there a kind of logical requirement that for something to be bad for you ? you've got to be around to receive that bad thing?
难道没有这样一种逻辑要求吗,如果有什么事物对你来说有坏处,你不是应该去接受那个有害的事物吗?
That in many cases, I can gain efficiency if I'm willing to give up space. Having said that though, there may still be a problem, or there ought to be a problem that may be bugging you slightly, which is how do I guarantee that my hash function takes any input into exactly one spot in the storage space?
普遍存在的增益和权衡,在许多的例子中,可以通过牺牲空间而得到效率方面的增加,话说回来,仍然存在一个问题,或者应该会有一个问题困扰着你,就是我如何保证我的哈希函数能够准确将,任一输入映射到相应的唯一的存贮空间中去?
That means, when I take two derivatives, I want to get a, then you should know enough calculus to know it has to be something like at^, and half comes from taking two derivatives.
也就是说,当我想求二阶导时,得到了a,你应该有足够的微积分知识,才能知道必须有类似at^的项,而这个1/2则是因为求了两次导数
应用推荐