• Well, the second that you choose Beta then someone's going it's in someone's best interest- to take advantage of it.

    第二个错误 如果了β,那么别人就从中攫取到好处

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And the claim is that when you choose this, in order to justify your decision, you denigrate the one you didn't choose.

    对这个行为的解释是,当这一粒时,为了表明择是正确的,你会贬低第一次没上的那粒。

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • And they said, suppose we know we're going to be paired together, I'll choose Beta if you choose Beta. Would that work?

    他俩这么商量的,咱俩被分到一组,要是β我也β,这成功吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • You'll learn a lot more about this if you take organic chemistry, but, In fact, you can then go on and make a bunch of other different kinds of very interesting molecules.

    如果了有机化学课,你会对它有更多的了解,但是,实际上,可以继续制造出一堆,其它不同类型的有意思的分子。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • If when someday a republican is elected to the White House and the president says Josh, pick. What would you like to do?

    如果将来一位共和党人当,入主白宫,然后总统对说,约书亚,任一个职位,你会选什么?

    普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

  • PROFESSOR: Great question. So the question is, how do you choose an algorithm, why would I choose to use a pseudo-polynomial algorithm when I don't know how big the solution is likely to be, I think that's one way to think about it.

    教授:问得好,所以问题是,怎样择算法,为什么当我,不知道解决方案有多大的时候,我要伪多项式算法呢,我想这是一种思考问题的方式。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • That means that you want to pick, ultimately, a point on this-- this line is tangent to the efficient portfolio frontier with all the other assets in it.

    那意味着你会最终在这上面一个点-,这条直线是与有效边界相切的,后者包含了所有的资产组合。

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • And so this one you didn't choose is then tainted and you turn and then when compared to a third one you favor that third one.

    第一次没上的那粒就被打上污点了,当拿它和第三粒相比较时,偏向于第三粒。

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • But you'll see that very clearly that Steven's right: that choosing 2 will always get me 5% more of the votes than choosing 1 from here on down.

    你会发现斯蒂文说的很对,从这里开始,立场2总比,立场1多获得5%

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • It's the safer answer if you can't decide whether or not your opponent's going to choose Left or Right, so you don't have to worry about having a payoff of 0.

    无法判断的对手会选左还是右时,下是较安全的答案,因此不必担心收益变成0

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • Working in the White House, what would you pick?

    在白宫工作,你会选什么?

    普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

  • So the players in this game are two firms and the strategies in this game for the firms and this is going to turn out to be important the strategies are the quantities that they produce of an identical product.

    这个博弈的参与人是两家公司,他们的可策略如下,以后你会知道这是多么重要,策略是,某种同质商品的产量

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • I mean if you chose Alpha, you're swinging from A to B-; and from Beta, swinging from B+ to C.

    要是α,的分数在A到B-,β,分数范围在B+到C

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So, for example, if you had chosen Beta and your pair had chosen Alpha, then you would get a C and your pair would get an A.

    比如说了β而的对手了α,你会得到C而的对手得到A

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So, for example, you might think Down is dominated, but if we look a bit carefully we see that Down actually does better than Up against Right, and Down does better than Middle against Left.

    例如说,们可能认为下是个劣势策略,但仔细观察后你会发现,参与人II右时,下要比上更好,参与人II左,下比中更好

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定