Hirsch was engaged in lifelong disagreement with Gadamer but he was a student of Wimsatt, the author of "The Intentional Fallacy."

赫施一生都不同意葛达玛的观点,但他是温姆斯特的学生，温姆斯特是《意图谬论》的作者之一“

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Meaning is in the intention of the author, and that is what we need to arrive at as we work through the text.

含义在作者的意图之中，也是我们在读这个作品时需要领会到的。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Well, look at this footnote: And the history of words after a poem is written may contribute meanings which if relevant to the original pattern should not be ruled out by a scruple about intention.

那么我们就来看一下这条脚注：,在诗产生后，语言的意思也就跟着产生了,这种意思如果和原始的形式不同,就不该有对作者意图的顾虑。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

How do you get from an intending author to an intentional structure and back?

如何从有意图的作者,到意向性结构然后在回过来？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

We don't refer--we have no reason to refer, - if we respect the autonomy of the poem as such, we don't refer-- we don't appeal to an authorial intention.

我们不能，我是说如果我们尊重，诗歌的意志自由的话，我们不能也没有理由-,为诗歌加上作者的意图。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

You prove to your teacher that you understand the authors by being able to put their meaning in other words -in other words, to say the author is intending to say something, not just that the text says something and this is what it says, with your exam then being one long screed of quotation.

你们用自己的话写出文章的含义,以此向老师证明你们理解作者的意图,换句话说，要告诉老师作者想表达什么，而不仅仅是文本说的什么内容，然后在试卷上来一大段,冗长的引用。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选