It was written in the second century sometime by a guy in Rome named Hermas,and it's called The Shepherd.
它成书于主后第二世纪左右,作者为一个叫黑马的罗马人,它被称为牧人书。
That is to say, when one can scarcely say the word "author" without thinking "authority," and one can definitely never say the word "authority" without thinking about the police.
意思就是说,当一个人说到“作者“,而想不到“权威“,或者一个人,在没想到警察的时候绝对不会想起“权威“这个字眼。
Yes, this is a book about the privations of growing up in the South poor and black, but it is very much, very consciously, a book about the development of someone who attends to language.
书的着重点的确是,记述在南方成长的穷孩子,但作者刻意地描述了,一个关注语言人的成长经历。
And one of the things one may immediately detect is whether or not the person who wrote the poem was indeed writing the poem and thought that she or he was in command, right?
一个人在阅读时很快就能发现,写这首诗的作者是否,真的是在独立作诗,认为自己对文字完全具有掌控权?
How is Foucault going to mount an argument in which privileged authors -that is to say, figures whom one cites positively and can somehow or another stay in the picture?
福柯又如何为特殊的作者辩护呢,特殊的作者即是经常被一个人引用,这些作家能被辩护吗?
But to speak of an intentional structure as a center is not at all the same thing as to speak of an intending person, author, being, or idea that brought it into existence, because that's extraneous.
但是讲到一个作为中心的意向性结构,与讲到一个创造它的人,作者,存在,或概念是完全不同的,因为那是外来的。
应用推荐